No one knows if there were even any holes,
sorry about the repeat
Hopefully someone can help me out here. The story as I recall is that this was simply a storage building before the Germans arrived.
I always looked at the rebar issue as proof positive that the story is fabricated until I saw a video of a tour guide saying that the building predates the war and the Germans converted it into a gas chamber. Which tended to nullify the whole issue with the rebar.HansHill wrote: ↑Mon Feb 24, 2025 1:39 pm Forgot to address the rebar issue. And this is a feature at the Birkenau site also.
The presence of rebar alone demonstrates that they were not zyklon insertion holes and were cut away after the war in a sloppy attempt at post-war fabrication of evidence. In the case of Birkenau this is even more strongly demonstrated as the rebar is bent back seemingly by hand, and would be a physical impediment to the secure fastening of the non-existent Kula columns.
According to Auschwitz: 1270 to the Present by Dwork and Van Pelt, the Auschwitz I camp began as a "migrant worker village" in or after 1910 (p.59). It was taken up by Polish troops in 1920 because of its ample housing space. The authors do not go in to any detail as to the construction of what they term the "ammunition depot" other than to say that it was "built by the Polish army in the 1920s" (p.322). Then they provide this German survey drawing of the site from December 1939 (p.325), which should be an accurate representation of how the Poles left it. The ammo depot is visible in the lower left.