were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
So Van Pelt's view was that the holes are invisible and perhaps covered up by cement, totally contrary to McCarthy. Justice Gray agreed with this and reiterated it in his judgement:Today, these four small holes that connected the wire-mesh columns and the chimneys cannot be observed in the ruined remains of the concrete slab. Yet does this mean they were never there? We know that after the cessation of the gassings in the Fall of 1944 all the gassing equipment was removed, which implies both the wire-mesh columns and the chimneys. What would have remained would have been the four narrow holes in the slab. While there is not certainty in this particular matter, it would have been logical to attach at the location where the columns had been some formwork at the bottom of the gas chamber ceiling, and pour some concrete in the holes, and thus restore the slab.
So which is it? Did McCarthy find the holes or were they cemented over?In response to Irving's claim van Pelt maintained, firstly, that the roof is in such a mess and most of it is so inaccessible that it is impossible to verify whether or not the holes existed. In any case he claimed that it is likely that, when the gas chambers were dismantled in 1944, the chimneys would have been removed and the holes cemented over so as to remove incriminating evidence.
were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
Thank you for posting this video. There is inescapable evidence presented of the aerial photos having been altered.
This is an outstanding video. Recently, I watched one where John Ball did a sit-down interview with Zundel, and while that was very informative, this video was much more in depth. At around the 42-minute mark, he discusses allied intelligence activities that have to do with the Auschwitz complex, especially Monowitz. Is there any material that discusses the extent to which allied intelligence was monitoring the claimed extermination camps and thoroughly investigating claims of mass extermination? I don't want to get off topic in this thread, but I think this could be a subject worth investigating in a separate post.
This is the first thing that drew my attention when I initially looked at these pictures. Comparing them to the close-up pictures of the holes of the Cremas posted by Wetzelrad, they are way too big to even be argued that they are the same. If there was a way to scale the holes on the picture to compare to the size of a human, then I believe that it would only make them look more ridiculous. The other glaring issue in the August 25th photo that I noticed is the layout of the holes in the roof of the two Cremas. In Crema II, the photo shows that they are in somewhat of a straight line. Crema III, however, shows that they are in a somewhat distinct diagonal pattern (I believe that this is how they are described in orthodoxy). We know that these facilities were made to be mirror images of each other based on design documentation. Did the Germans one day decide to go with two different hole patterns for each "gas chamber" instead of making them identical? This wouldn't seem to make any sense if they are supposed to be identical. The alignment differences between the two Cremas could be attributed to the shot angle, shadows, or other minute factors, but this would be a massive stretch. The much more reasonable and plausible explanation is that the people who drew the holes on the roof made a mistake.