The CODOH Revisionist Forum

The reconstruction of the chimney is now readily admitted by the orthodoxy and its reconstruction is no longer a point of contention.

This part of the revisionist critique is a holdover to an earlier time.

While memeable, this point has become rather mute.

Now, the Krema roller coaster, that one is still memeable and not as easily explained away by the orthodoxy, as it is as well supported as all of the other ridiculousness they tout, as are the bicycle gas chamber races etc.

There are at least 6,000,000 lies about what happened in the Auschwitz complexes. The restoration of the chimney at Krema I is no longer one of them.

Notice that no exterminationist has addressed the monuments at the pond. I doubt they will.

Stubble wrote: ↑Wed Apr 30, 2025 12:22 pm Notice that no exterminationist has addressed the monuments at the pond. I doubt they will.

I did notice that Nessie is running away from the monuments at the pond issue.

There is a question on the http://thisisaboutscience.com/ website that specifically addresses this.

I wonder if Nessie has the courage to answer it?

*6 - Is it - True. - or - False. - that; The alleged Auschwitz - “ASH POND” - / - BURIAL SITE -



has never been archeologically / forensically / scientifically proven to contain so-much-as 1 / 100 of 1 percent of - THIS DEATH TOLL - figure - https://www.islam-radio.net/islam/engli ... educed.gif - ??

Nessie wrote: ↑Sun Apr 27, 2025 1:13 pm The reason why the mass murder of millions of Jews had been settled as fact, is because of the evidence. That is also the reason why the death camp staff put on trial, never denied that those camps were used for mass murder and instead they tried to minimise their personal responsibility.

Nessie, after the Nuremberg trials, was it considered a "settled fact" that 4 million jews were murdered at Auschwitz?

Nessie, shortly after the Nuremberg trials, could one have "proven" the "fact" that 4 million jews had been murdered at Auschwitz using the "conversion of evidence" method?

Nessie, does the "conversion of evidence" method prove things with 100% certainty 100% of the time - Yes. - or - No. - ??