Re: The historicity of "blood libel"/ritual murder
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2025 11:52 pm
by Stubble
Anytime.
Two minor clarifications;
1) it is not from 'A Portrait in Sound' but rather from a 2024 documentary titled 'Making a Nazi: The George Lincoln Rockwell Story'
2) it was not a Senator's Wife, but an Ambassador's.
The framing sounds pretty nuts, but, we aren't actually privy to the interaction and honestly bloody mattresses and strollers and high chairs under NYC Chabad Lubavitch also sounds insane.
With regard to my profile pic, some wise words from GLR;
Direct source for the quote about the tunnels is 'This Time The World' p232
Re: The historicity of "blood libel"/ritual murder
Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2025 2:14 am
by Stubble
I was sorting my files this evening in an effort to make things easier for me to find and I ran across this book. I don't know if it has been mentioned up to this point, but, I leave it here regardless in the hope that it has not. (I find that it was mentioned by Mr Seeker, but, a link was not provided, a link is now provided)
This is a translation of a book from 'The War Years'. 'Jewish Ritual Murder - A Historical Investigation'.
Re: The historicity of "blood libel"/ritual murder
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2025 6:06 pm
by slob
Why would the Board of Deputies of Jews, keep this book from ever being published, now for over 100 years? What is in it they do not want known? Sir Richard Burton was a famous highly praised significant world traveller and explorer, if anyone knew stuff, he did?
Re: The historicity of "blood libel"/ritual murder
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2025 1:09 am
by Hektor
slob wrote: ↑Thu Dec 11, 2025 6:06 pm
Why would the Board of Deputies of Jews, keep this book from ever being published, now for over 100 years? What is in it they do not want known? Sir Richard Burton was a famous highly praised significant world traveller and explorer, if anyone knew stuff, he did?
He had interactions with Jews and indeed he was well travelled and knowledgeable.
One can take your question further as well. Why is there a Jewish board of deputies, to begin with? And why do they lobby for banning books?
As far as ritual murders are concerned, it isn't/wasn't alleged that all Jews participated in this, nor that this was common. What was alleged was that some Jews - sects among them - engaged in this. It is akin to muti murders among Blacks. And strangely, Blacks don't have lobby group that try to ban books on this, while the literature is indeed lacking there...
Re: The historicity of "blood libel"/ritual murder
I've been trying to figure out exactly where you are going with your last 2 posts.
Interesting. That strikes me as a similar line of enquiry to the one by HansHill here: viewtopic.php?p=17938#p17938
I don’t think I’m “driving at” anything, nor trying to “go” anywhere with this.
My approach is this: ‘here is some evidence appearing to show that some jews today STILL have a whole thing about ritual murder by draining the victim of their blood and blood sacrifices in general’.
That’s it!
And I suggest that evidence for this stands in its own.
It doesn’t need me or anyone to ‘drive’ it nor ‘go’ anywhere with it.
The evidence demonstrates that a jewish mindset having to do with ideas of ‘ritual murder’ and ‘blood sacrifice’ and ‘human sactifice’ appear NOT to be some nasty, old, ‘blood libel’, anti-semitic hate-trope.
Nor does it appear to be any weird, antiquated and now obsolete practice from the medeival times. Its current and powerfully present in the demented thinking of many people who delusionally self-identify as ‘jewish’ TODAY, NOW. And it appears to apply to both a.) secular athiest and b.) practicing religious ‘jews’.
That’s all my posts were intended to share.
BOTTOM LINE: Stuff ‘happens’. Humans make it ‘mean’ something. The ‘happening’ and the applied ‘meaning’ are separate. Each human can apply manifold contrary meanings to what we are experiencing. And sometimes we can choose and apply only one sacrosanct ‘meaning’. People often try to gain fellow-believers for their chosen, sacrosanct ‘meanings’.
I’m not in that game.
There’s just what ‘happens’. And sometimes there is what is repeatedly ‘happening’.
Let’s just concentrate on that.
Plus let's see if we can agree what actually ‘happened’ devoid of any meaning anyone wants to apply to it.
WHAT WE KNOW ‘HAPPENED’
In this case we can know that ‘what has already happened’ is that for millenia Jews have been accused of ritual murders of non-jewish people that involved bleeding out their victims.
We can also know that they have a religion that STILL has rituals involving animal sacrifices and in the past openly had even human sacrifices.
We know that other primitive peoples shared this behaviour — the Aztecs, the Incas, the Phoenecians.
We know that these other people did not do their human sacrifices in secret, nor denied them.
We know that the accusation with credible evidence is that jews did.
We know that such jewish, ritualised murders in secret and denied were recorded and two recent incidences created a global sensation in 1890 in Egypt and in Russia in 1911.
I am suggesting that we can also know with certainty that variations of what appears to be the same mentality and similar behaviour is continuing in plain sight NOW in 2025 by jews of seemingly otherwise very modern outlooks.
That’s all.
Re: The historicity of "blood libel"/ritual murder
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2026 4:28 am
by Stubble
Mr Seeker,
The above is very unpleasant and The Palestinian People have my sympathy.
Belive it or not I've been actively exposing as many people as possible to the problems there for the last 20 years.
My activism with this issue started around 2000. I read an article about some Palestinian Children who were gunned down for throwing light bulbs full of paint at an IDF tank. I forget the specifics, if the tank was tearing up their soccer field or something else.
Anyhow, this didn't sit right, and I was like 'naw, that didn't happen'. Well, then I learned about Red Cross Volunteers from Great Britain being shot in the face with 50 cal m2's. I watched videos of Israelis destroying crops, and houses, and taking land from people for 'imminent domain'. The more I dug, the worse it got.
There's not much i can do from my house, but, I do pass out the red pills and try to get people to look. I've been doing that for 20 + years.
Re: The historicity of "blood libel"/ritual murder
Posted: Sun Mar 08, 2026 5:53 am
by Wahrheitssucher
Stubble wrote: ↑Sun Mar 08, 2026 4:28 am
Mr Seeker,
The above is very unpleasant and The Palestinian People have my sympathy.
Belive it or not I've been actively exposing as many people as possible to the problems there for the last 20 years.
My activism with this issue started around 2000. I read an article about some Palestinian Children who were gunned down for throwing light bulbs full of paint at an IDF tank. I forget the specifics, if the tank was tearing up their soccer field or something else.
Anyhow, this didn't sit right, and I was like 'naw, that didn't happen'. Well, then I learned about Red Cross Volunteers from Great Britain being shot in the face with 50 cal m2's. I watched videos of Israelis destroying crops, and houses, and taking land from people for 'imminent domain'. The more I dug, the worse it got.
There's not much i can do from my house, but, I do pass out the red pills and try to get people to look. I've been doing that for 20 + years.
Respect! You have my respect and admiration for this.
Well done, sir.
Respect!