Page 2 of 2
Re: The case against gassing compared to shooting.
Posted: Tue May 26, 2026 6:49 pm
by Keen
HansHill wrote: ↑Tue May 26, 2026 11:01 am
Stop distorting arguments and arguing in bad faith. This is why you are contained to your slop bin.
Come on HansHill, you know it is incapable of doing anything in good faith.
What should stop is revisionists playing the game that it wants revisionists to play.
Re: The case against gassing compared to shooting.
Posted: Tue May 26, 2026 6:54 pm
by Keen
Wetzelrad wrote: ↑Tue May 26, 2026 5:08 pm
You are now denying that evidence is evidence while avoiding a very simple question.
...
In sum, your explanation is totally incoherent, nonsensical, and contradicted by the evidential record.
Avoiding simple questions is what it does as it cravenly runs from its burden of proof.
It is playing the only game it can.
The question should be: Why do revisionists continue to play games with it?
Talk about nonsensical.
Re: The case against gassing compared to shooting.
Posted: Tue May 26, 2026 6:56 pm
by Keen
Wetzelrad wrote: ↑Tue May 26, 2026 5:14 pm
Insane behavior.
So why do you participate in the mentally ill HC cult member's insanity?
Re: The case against gassing compared to shooting.
Posted: Tue May 26, 2026 6:57 pm
by Keen
Nesserto wrote: ↑Tue May 26, 2026 11:29 am
What is the "case"?
The case is explained here:
viewtopic.php?p=24672#p24672
and here:
viewtopic.php?p=24673#p24673