Page 13 of 13
Re: Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?
Posted: Thu May 07, 2026 2:40 pm
by Stubble
bombsaway wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2026 2:35 pm
Stubble wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2026 2:22 pm
So far as what it has to fo with Aktion 1005. You are the one who brought up this Polish Commission Report, saying it proves the evidence was not deleted.
No I brought it up to show that orthodoxy doesn't believe all the evidence was erased.
Dude, I've cited a 1,400p book talking about exactly how Aktion 1005 was supposedly able to erase the evidence.
You are going back in the ignore bucket. You are just going in circles and refusing to engage with any discussion to move the thread forward. You are just cluttering this thread at this point.
It is utterly useless talking to you at this point.
Re: Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?
Posted: Thu May 07, 2026 2:52 pm
by bombsaway
Stubble wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2026 2:40 pm
bombsaway wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2026 2:35 pm
Stubble wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2026 2:22 pm
So far as what it has to fo with Aktion 1005. You are the one who brought up this Polish Commission Report, saying it proves the evidence was not deleted.
No I brought it up to show that orthodoxy doesn't believe all the evidence was erased.
Dude, I've cited a 1,400p book talking about exactly how Aktion 1005 was supposedly able to erase the evidence.
You are going back in the ignore bucket. You are just going in circles and refusing to engage with any discussion to move the thread forward. You are just cluttering this thread at this point.
It is utterly useless talking to you at this point.
So they believe the evidence was all erased, yet they also believe that the graves were largely emptied and contents deposited in fields at Treblinka? This does not accord