Page 3 of 3
Re: Best Mainstream Pieces of Evidence
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2025 12:13 pm
by Keen
Nessie wrote: ↑Wed Sep 17, 2025 6:22 am
A photo is a stronger piece of evidence than a memory. Forensic evidence is routinely regarded as the most accurate.
Speaking of photo's Nessie, we've been asking you to contribute them here:
viewtopic.php?p=15969#p15969
for some time.
After all, you alleged the following:
Nessie:
There are plenty of photos of cremated remains found at Sobibor.
Nessie, we need photos of human remains for Sobibor "huge mass graves"
#9, #10, #11, #17, #18, #19, #20 & #21.
What are you waiting for Sergay?
What are you so afraid of?
Not a single photo proving that 8 out of the 20 fraudulently alleged "huge mass graves" of Sobibor even exist!

Re: Best Mainstream Pieces of Evidence
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2025 12:23 pm
by Keen
ConfusedJew wrote: ↑Sun Sep 14, 2025 5:41 pm
every judge and jury that has looked at the evidence presented to them in court have ruled that the Holocaust is real
Confused,
VI - Is it - True. - or - False. - that; Blacks Law Dictionary defines - Burden of Proof - as: “The necessity or duty of affirmatively proving a fact or facts in dispute on an issue raised between the parties in a cause.” - ??
VII - Is it - True. - or - False. - that; The maxims of law found in Bouvier's Law Dictionary include: “The claimant is always bound to prove: the burden of proof lies on him.” - and - “The burden of the proof lies upon him who affirms, not he who denies.” - ??
VIII - Is it - True. - or - False. - that; If “huge mass graves” containing tons of human remains really were “forensically proven” to exist at Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II - via bona fide, verifiably honest, and conclusively documented archaeology - then such “scientific proof” would be considered credible and convincing evidence in a U.S. court of law - ??
IX - Is it - True. - or False. - that; If something really is an “undeniable scientifically proven fact” - then it should be provable as such in a U.S. court of law - ??
X - Has it been legally determined in the U.S. that all 89 of the alleged graves / cremation pits in question (
http://thisisaboutscience.com/ ) - currently contain human remains - Yes. - or - No. - ??
XI - Has it been legally determined in the U.S. that all 89 of the alleged graves / cremation pits in question (
http://thisisaboutscience.com/ ) - even exist - Yes. - or - No. - ??