Callafangers wrote: ↑Tue Jan 06, 2026 9:16 pm
If I ever find myself agreeing with Netanyahu, it's a guarantee I may be way off-course. That Nick sees no problem with this is perhaps the first truly red flag I have seen from him. This isn't to say there aren't other 'flags', only that I have not been paying much attention.
My first red flag was the Fuentes' version of Ray Epps.
Callafangers wrote: ↑Tue Jan 06, 2026 9:16 pm
If I ever find myself agreeing with Netanyahu, it's a guarantee I may be way off-course. That Nick sees no problem with this is perhaps the first truly red flag I have seen from him. This isn't to say there aren't other 'flags', only that I have not been paying much attention.
My first red flag was the Fuentes' version of Ray Epps.
Ray Epps, the guy from the Bundy Ranch standoff? I think he might be a, fed.
Re: Nick Fuentes and the 'Holocaust'
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2026 9:35 pm
by Hektor
HansHill wrote: ↑Wed Jan 07, 2026 10:47 am
Very poor set of takes from Fuentes here, i certainly didn't have this on my 2026 bingo card. I am glad to see his base reject these poor takes, but ultimately i think its regrettable and unfortunate that he now has ended his "generational run" as the above video phrased it.
@Wetzelrad fair enough, we can agree to disagree on that strategy. I believe it would be a net positive for the tiny Revisionist movement were it to be promoted to Piers' ~4 million person audience and let the chips fall where they may, but I do see your point about opening doors is enough for him, and he risks blundering a certain key point (which holds for any debater online to be fair).
I was astonished to hear from Millenials/Zoomers themselves and without me asking anything in that direction that they didn't believe the Holocaust Narrative anymore. And this isn't really isolated. They smell a rat and they realize that it is actually a relevant one.
Re: Nick Fuentes and the 'Holocaust'
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2026 6:09 am
by Stubble
I see YouTube has removed the music.
The song must go on.
Re: Nick Fuentes and the 'Holocaust'
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2026 10:54 pm
by curioussoul
Callafangers wrote: ↑Tue Jan 06, 2026 9:16 pmIf I ever find myself agreeing with Netanyahu, it's a guarantee I may be way off-course. That Nick sees no problem with this is perhaps the first truly red flag I have seen from him. This isn't to say there aren't other 'flags', only that I have not been paying much attention.
To be fair I think Nick has been consistent on the "Western hemisphere" thing for a while (I saw an old clip from like 7 years ago where he specifically mentioned intervention in Venezuela being acceptable under the Monroe Doctrine). That being said, the Greenland stuff is just pure ego from Trump.
I wouldn't call these things red flags per se. Nick is the real deal, but no one is perfect and no one is ever going to align with your personal beliefs all the time. I find myself frustrated with him a lot of the time because he comes off as childish and edgy, and he aligns himself with people he's later forced to defend. Whether that's an intentional strategy for getting the message out/community building, I don't know. He's at his absolute peak when he sticks to stuff he's good at, which is mainly politics and geopolitics, especially as it pertains to the Middle East, etc.
It's a shame he hasn't invested a lot into the Holocaust because with his verbal intelligence and reach he'd be a great ambassador.
Re: Nick Fuentes and the 'Holocaust'
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2026 11:23 pm
by HansHill
Hektor wrote: ↑Thu Jan 15, 2026 9:35 pm
I was astonished to hear from Millenials/Zoomers themselves and without me asking anything in that direction that they didn't believe the Holocaust Narrative anymore. And this isn't really isolated. They smell a rat and they realize that it is actually a relevant one.
I absolutely agree Herr Hektor. There are young people in my own life who are aware of my background, who will seek out this information casually and in person. They might sometimes ask in clunky ways that are "confirmation biased", such as "why is the Holocaust fake?" or "Why was Hitler the good guy?" but nonetheless, it's absolutely fascinating. Conversations like this obviously need to be handled delicately, and unemotionally.
This includes both young family members, and for example, friends of my kids who's parents know me and my profession! Really I think the next era will be a fascinating one. One thing I like to repeat here, is that knowledgeable revisionists have a duty of care to give the best coaching to the younger generations that we can. For example, I will not sent a 16 year old to go read Rudold's TCOA. I am often reminded and humbled that people like Nick Fuentes are still in their mid-20s. Holy sh*t. In my mid 20s, I still thought the Holocaust was real!
We need some serious contemplation and focus here.
Callafangers wrote: ↑Tue Jan 06, 2026 9:16 pm
If I ever find myself agreeing with Netanyahu, it's a guarantee I may be way off-course. That Nick sees no problem with this is perhaps the first truly red flag I have seen from him. This isn't to say there aren't other 'flags', only that I have not been paying much attention.
My first red flag was the Fuentes' version of Ray Epps.
Ray Epps, the guy from the Bundy Ranch standoff? I think he might be a, fed.
Yes Fuentes was encouraging the protestors to go into the Capitol building, just like Epps.