The CODOH Revisionist Forum

Stubble wrote: ↑Thu Feb 20, 2025 11:01 pm

Numar Patru wrote: ↑Thu Feb 20, 2025 10:58 pm I don’t see this soap document reproduced here. Is it available?

There is a link in the article linked by Bombsaway in the references.

So a document cited by Mattogno?

I’m supposed to take his word for it? Didja see what I showed about his research just yesterday?

Numar Patru wrote: ↑Thu Feb 20, 2025 11:51 pm

Stubble wrote: ↑Thu Feb 20, 2025 11:01 pm

Numar Patru wrote: ↑Thu Feb 20, 2025 10:58 pm I don’t see this soap document reproduced here. Is it available?

There is a link in the article linked by Bombsaway in the references.

So a document cited by Mattogno?

I’m supposed to take his word for it? Didja see what I showed about his research just yesterday?

I saw the misstep in the chronology thread. In his defense, he did get the day and month right. The year is also an important factor in the date however.

Also in just looking over the article, I’m not sure what your objection is. The soap was for employable Jews, no?

Numar Patru wrote: ↑Fri Feb 21, 2025 12:03 am Also in just looking over the article, I’m not sure what your objection is. The soap was for employable Jews, no?

Alright, you've both said this now, what did I miss? These are 'employable jews' kept in isolation for 8 to 10 weeks without clean underwear?

Still not seeing the issue here, frankly.

I think at this point, it's time for a thread on the Hungarian jews. I'm going to link this article in it, and we can expound there.

I don't think these jews in isolation block 8 and isolation block 12 are employable jews. An 8-10 week stay in isolation seems a bit long for an 'employable jew' to be kept in isolation.

We can get into it more in another thread.