Page 4 of 4

Re: The Birkenau crematoria: what real 'convergence of evidence' looks like

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2025 6:53 pm
by Keen
Nessie wrote: Tue Apr 29, 2025 6:41 am
You know that, yet you still regard all witnesses as equal. :?

Neither Himmler nor Vrba were eyewitnesses, so their use as witnesses is very limited. How do you still not understand that?
Nessie, are you suggesting that a piece of evidence from one witness may have more evidential value than another witness?

Re: The Birkenau crematoria: what real 'convergence of evidence' looks like

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2025 6:58 pm
by Keen
Nessie wrote: Tue Apr 29, 2025 11:53 am
There is only one definition of an eyewitness and the clue is in the name. Someone saw with their own eyes what they then later speak about. They actually witnessed the event as it happened. They likely did not see the entire event and they will have witnessed it with a different perspective to other eyewitnesses. They will also remember and recollect the event differently to other eyewitnesses. That explains why the eyewitnesses vary in their details.
Nessie,

XIV - Is it - True. - or False. - that; It is common for juries in the U.S. to be given instructions that include some form of the following: “If you decide that a witness has deliberately testified untruthfully about something important, you may choose not to believe anything that witness said.” - ??

Re: The Birkenau crematoria: what real 'convergence of evidence' looks like

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2025 7:19 pm
by Keen
Nessie wrote: Mon Apr 28, 2025 10:41 am
You are not using converging evidence, you are using the logically flawed argument from incredulity.
Nessie, in this "convergence of evidence" method you use to allege that the jewish holocaust of WW II has been proven, do some forms of evidence have more evidential value than others?

Re: The Birkenau crematoria: what real 'convergence of evidence' looks like

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2025 7:35 pm
by Keen
Nessie wrote: Wed Apr 30, 2025 12:55 pm I would expect mass graves that had been dug into to exhume the corpses, to not be perfectly rectangular. Chelmno was found to have a series of rectilinear pits. TII also had such identified during the geophysical survey. Belzec and Sobibor were more irregular again, indicating more digging.
Nessie, concerning the mass graves graves at Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II; you speak as if it is a fact that they exist. Are you alleging that these mass graves have been irrefutably proven to exist and currently contain human remains - Yes. - or - No. - ??

If your answer is - Yes. - do you have the courage and integrity to defend that allegation in a seperate thread - Yes. - or - No. - ??

Re: The Birkenau crematoria: what real 'convergence of evidence' looks like

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2025 7:53 pm
by Keen
Nessie wrote: Wed Apr 30, 2025 6:24 am Himmler could have only given hearsay evidence about the day to day operation of Kremas and hearsay is not normally allowed in courts.
Speaking of courts Nessie; Are there different levels of proof / proven - Yes. - or - No. ??

Nessie, you claim that something can be "proven" by a conversion of evidence. Can something be disproven by a lack of evidence?