Re: The Birkenau crematoria: what real 'convergence of evidence' looks like
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2025 6:53 pm
Nessie, are you suggesting that a piece of evidence from one witness may have more evidential value than another witness?
Where Myths Meet Their Demise
https://www.codohforum.com/
Nessie, are you suggesting that a piece of evidence from one witness may have more evidential value than another witness?
Nessie,Nessie wrote: ↑Tue Apr 29, 2025 11:53 am
There is only one definition of an eyewitness and the clue is in the name. Someone saw with their own eyes what they then later speak about. They actually witnessed the event as it happened. They likely did not see the entire event and they will have witnessed it with a different perspective to other eyewitnesses. They will also remember and recollect the event differently to other eyewitnesses. That explains why the eyewitnesses vary in their details.
Nessie, in this "convergence of evidence" method you use to allege that the jewish holocaust of WW II has been proven, do some forms of evidence have more evidential value than others?
Nessie, concerning the mass graves graves at Belzec, Chelmno, Sobibor and Treblinka II; you speak as if it is a fact that they exist. Are you alleging that these mass graves have been irrefutably proven to exist and currently contain human remains - Yes. - or - No. - ??Nessie wrote: ↑Wed Apr 30, 2025 12:55 pm I would expect mass graves that had been dug into to exhume the corpses, to not be perfectly rectangular. Chelmno was found to have a series of rectilinear pits. TII also had such identified during the geophysical survey. Belzec and Sobibor were more irregular again, indicating more digging.
Speaking of courts Nessie; Are there different levels of proof / proven - Yes. - or - No. ??