The CODOH Revisionist Forum

https://www.nizkor.org/session-088-04-eichmann-adolf/

"Q. You do admit, therefore, that you were an accomplice to
the murder of millions of Jews?

A. No, that I cannot admit. From the human – let me say
from the point of view of human guilt, a question which I
have to judge in a much graver manner, because in this
respect I must sit in judgment with myself – in this respect
I must admit that I have played my part, though under
orders. From the legal point of view, as a recipient of
orders, I had no choice but to carry out the orders I
received. How far the fact that I had to carry out part of
the deportations and that the Jews who were thus deported
found their death, how far I am legally guilty is a question
which, in my opinion, should be left until the question of
responsibility has been examined."

Note that at no time did Eichmann dispute that millions of Jews had been murdered and offer an alternative, whereby millions of Jews, of which he admits to being part of the deportations, remained alive. He only denies being an accomplice to the murders.

Eichmann, like every single Nazi who has ever been put on trial, failed to provide any evidence that would support so-called revisionist claims of no mass murders and evidence to construct a revised chronology of events.

.
Deceivers, delusional believers and gullible victims of false histories claim that Eichmann never denied being involved in a genocidal plan to mass-murder Jews in what the atrocity propaganda calls ‘death camps’.

This is false!
Eichmann definitely did deny all that.

The reason why his denial of this false accusation is not widely known is because it has been — and still is being — concealed by the racist, anti-German, holyH promoters.

I have posted this FACT before, with the verifiable reference, numerous times at RODOH. So anyone who was addictively involved in discussion there will already know this. Therefore proving that such people are dishonest and/or delusional if they claim Eichmann confessed his knowing involvement in the alleged mass-murder-of-all-Jews policy.

SUMMARY: it is ironically such people who are the actual ‘deniers’ of accurate history.

. . . . . . . . .

The following words are taken from the published account of an American Christian Pastor who had permission to visit Eichmann in prison with his German wife acting as translator. He wanted to get Eichmann to fully confess to his crimes and seek forgiveness from God so that his ‘eternal soul’ could receive ‘salvation’.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

This is the letter I handed him:

Jerusalem, Israel,
21st of May, 1962.

Dear Adolf Eichmann;
The enclosed paper has been drawn up for you to sign. I have prepared this as speedily as possible so that it may be made public before the appeal judgment has been made known.
The appeal judgment has already been written and cannot be affected by your signing this paper. On the other hand for this confession to be made public at this time before the official judgment is made known would greatly increase the confidence of the world public in the sincerity of your motives in signing this paper.
I believe that it would be a brave and courageous act for you to sign this confession as it is written at this time and that you will feel better and sleep better and be ready to meet God.
Very sincerely yours,
Signed: William L. Hull

The confession form was as follows:

Desiring to make atonement to God and to man as much as lies within my power, I, Adolf Eichmann, do hereby now repent of all my sins and acknowledge my unworthiness of forgiveness by God and man.

I do confess that in obedience to orders and instructions from my superior officers in the National Socialist German Reich (Third Reich) I, SS Obersturmbannführer Adolf Eichmann, head of the Office IV B 4, RSHA, did:

1. Arrange for the transport of Jews and others from various countries of Europe to death camps in Germany and Poland as a result of which millions of Jews and others were put to death.

2. Beyond asking for a transfer, make no real effort to be relieved of my command and duties and did remain in my position as head of the department responsible for the final solution of the Jewish question until the year 1945.

3. Remain a member of the Nazi Party from 1932 until the end of the war in 1945 knowing that an important part of its policy was to persecute and eventually exterminate the Jewish race from the earth. As a voluntary and continuing member of the Nazi Party I bear my share of responsibility for all the acts of the Party.

4. Perform my duties in a manner which gave little chance for the survival of any Jew who came under my jurisdiction.

I do hereby testify to my faith in the Lord Jesus Christ as the Son of God and the Saviour of the world.
I do hereby accept the Lord Jesus Christ as my Saviour and believe that through my faith in Him my sins are forgiven by the grace of God and that I am now ready to stand before God.

Eichmann read the first two paragraphs and his face began to darken. He frowned and became wild-looking.
And then, angrily, as he read point one, he said:

EICHMANN: This is false, this is false.
It is not true.
I am not guilty.
I could not sign this, it is not true.

(He reads point two.) This also is not true.

(He reads point three.) I cannot sign this.

(He reads point four.) I will not sign…

HULL:
…I do not want you to sign something you do not believe. I want you to read this carefully. You claim that you pray. Pray about this. There is no hurry. Think it over and pray about it.
I have tried to make it very easy for you. The world and the Christians who are praying for you will not be satisfied with anything less.

EICHMANN: Even in the court they did not accuse me of all this.

~ From ‘The struggle for a soul’ by Pastor W.L.Hull, Chapter 16, pgs.113-115.

Eichmann's CV was full of work regarding the organisation of the transportation, deportation and the Final Solution. If there was a mass resettlement programme, that meant by 1944, millions of Jews arrested 1939-44 were now settled, he would have known about it. Instead, he said nothing. Not to Sassen, not the court in Jerusalem, nor to anyone else he spoke to.

Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Wed Sep 10, 2025 12:45 pm The following words are taken from the published account of an American Christian Pastor who had permission to visit Eichmann in prison with his German wife acting as translator.

That's interesting. I had missed this. It's amazing how many times I've been asked to put my faith in certain Nazi confessions which are parroted by every major media organization, while contrary claims like these are given such short shrift that even I in searching for them never hear about them.

Some, food for thought;

https://www.wral.com/story/isabel-kersh ... /20363390/

From the article;

[...]The documentary was recently screened for commanders and officers of the intelligence corps — an indication of the importance with which it has been viewed in Israel.[...]

So, it would appear that this documentary at least, is 'Hasbara Approved'...

Also from the article;

The German authorities and the owner of the tapes gave the filmmakers free access to 15 hours of surviving audio. (Sassen had recorded about 70 hours, but he had taped over many of the expensive reels after transcribing them.) Mozer said that the owner of the tapes and the archive had finally agreed to give the filmmakers access, believing that they would treat the material respectfully and responsibly.

And thus, what was actually on the tapes, will never be known...

What is known is that they represent a valuable 'tool' for 'holocaust promoters'.

Do I doubt that Mr Geysers of Blood himself may have promoted the exterminationist narrative in the tapes?

>no<

The man claimed a Soviet submarine engine was used as an instrument of death and made all sorts of other ludicrous claims.

With the 'event' being considered an 'established fact' under the law, after the tortured confession of Hoess, what was left for him as a legal defense was 'just following orders'.

In the end he still danced at the end of a rope, as did so many others.

A thing that gets ignored by holocaust promoters is the simple problem presented by the confession of Hoess given the legal framework in place. None could deny as a defense. Many incorporated the insane into their confessions, in my opinion, as a tell to the future and as a grounds for appeal did they not dance at the end of a rope.

Of course, this bit of legal fact is always dismissed, as with the controlling of the narrative by judges and other nefarious goings on, and yet, it remains, a matter of record.

The Einsatzgruppen commanders were hung because there was no order, Eichmann was hung because he said there was. In the end, there was no defense that could exonerate the accused after the narrative was set. All Eichmann could do, and did do, was try to get as many details about the orthodox narrative as possible and to downplay any responsibility. Even this failed to spare his neck.

Had he 'denied' the 'established facts', he would have been excluded from speaking on his own behalf.

Had I been in his shoes, I wouldn't have tried to 'play the game' to 'save my skin'. I'd have told the unvarnished truth such as I knew it and let the chips fall.

Unfortunately, Mr Eichmann was not such a man.

Wetzelrad wrote: ↑Wed Sep 10, 2025 6:34 pm

Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Wed Sep 10, 2025 12:45 pm The following words are taken from the published account of an American Christian Pastor who had permission to visit Eichmann in prison with his German wife acting as translator.

That's interesting. I had missed this. It's amazing how many times I've been asked to put my faith in certain Nazi confessions which are parroted by every major media organization, while contrary claims like these are given such short shrift that even I in searching for them never hear about them.

Those who seek to deny their involvement in the crime, rather than the crime itself, or, the guilty who are lying, or both, will trip themselves up.