Where Myths Meet Their Demise
https://www.codohforum.com/
There is one good thing about people going in circles with this pathologically lying POS:
If a challenge is made, it should not be a requirement to accept it, or else constant challenges can be made designed to tie the poster up constantly responding, or being made to do a lot of work.Warning label for disruptive and deceptive posters
Post by HansHill » Fri Jul 10, 2026 10:14 am
Crossposting this here from the Quarantine forum, it is a thought i am having already:
It could be implemented in such a way as, when a challenge is issued and failed, the original post is amended with the warning label.HansHill wrote: ↑Fri Jul 10, 2026 9:58 am
Reported for dodging challenge. 800,000 bodies not presented.
Suggest user's posts are manually amended by the mod team to include "Warning - This User Is Intentionally Deceptive"
Archie, you quarantined me, because the so-called revisionists here could not cope with my critiquing of their arguments and methodology and the evidence I can link to.I added a "Quarantined" rank to make it clear who has been confined there. If a poster is quarantined, this implies their posts do not meet the quality standards required for the main boards.
I am waiting for you to explain how I have dodged providing you with evidence of 800,000 bodies buried at TII.
It is an exaggeration to say the descriptions of the Kula column are contradictory. They vary, with those who saw the column in action saying that a bucket lifted the Zyklon B out.The idea that there was an undocumented change in the design was Nessie's suggestion. Nessie, to his credit, recognized that the descriptions were obviously contradictory and that was his way of dealing with it.
The variances in witness statements are what you work with, to suggest the witnesses lied. But variances do not prove lying and they also prove a lack of collusion. If you asked 10 people to describe the same thing, years after they last saw it, you would 10 variations. The important part is, are they describing the same thing? The answer is yes and it is only pertinent to two of the Kremas and the documentary reference is specific to one of those buildings.There's no proof these columns ever existed, and no one can explain how they worked.
No matter what the claim is, the burden of proof is on the claimant.
I have never had any issue with accepting the burden of proof.
There is no circumstance in which I reverse the burden of proof.
If you make a claim, it is up to you to prove it. If I make one, it is up to me.
BELZEC, CHELMNO, PONARY, SOBIBOR and TREBLINKA II
Are the remains of 2.145 million Jews really buried in the 100 alleged “scientifically proven” mass graves?
(The labeling of asking this legitimate adjudicable question as “hate / antisemitic” is your first clue that they do not want you to know what the answer is.)
OPENING / FUNDAMENTAL STATEMENT OF FACT: It is alleged in orthodox historiography that; during WW II, the bodies and burnt remains of hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of Jews were buried in numerous “huge mass graves” at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II. However, despite all the deceptive, unsubstantiated allegations to the contrary, the truth is, the largest (in terms of quantity of remains) of the 100 graves in question that are fraudulently alleged to have been “scientifically proven” to currently exist at these five sites, in which verified human remains have been uncovered / tangibly located via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology, contained the remains of - ONLY SIX PEOPLE.
Note: Using the information presented on this website and applying legal standards used in U.S. courts, the above opening / fundamental statement of fact, which is written as, and can be defined as - a rebuttable presumption - can be - LEGALLY - ACCEPTED - AS - TRUE - in a U.S. court.
https://thisisaboutscience.com/
A - $100.00 reward - is being offered for each one of the 100 alleged “scientifically proven” mass graves / cremation pits in question that is proven - with the same standard of proof applied in U. S. civil courts - to actually exist and to currently contain the remains of - at least 2 people. (That is less than one tenth of one one thousandth of one percent of the alleged mass murder.)
Note: The 6 original fraudulently alleged “huge mass graves” of Treblinka II that were alleged by “authoritative eyewitnesses” and allegedly - “PROVEN” - to exist in the early show trials - MODEL - MAP - (but never proven to exist), are also included in the above reward offer. (A photo of one of these 6 fraudulently alleged “huge mass graves” can be seen - HERE.)
Also note: This reward offer, as it applies to Treblinka II, can also be claimed for each 14 pounds of cremains discovered - ANYWHERE - within the camp boundary.
https://thisisaboutscience.com/
Quote mining is dishonest. The full quote is "Are you suggesting that because I cannot physically show you mass graves, where 800,000 corpses can be individually counted, such as the mass graves at Katyn, that means I cannot prove mass graves?"
A - $100.00 reward - is being offered for each one of the 100 alleged “scientifically proven” mass graves / cremation pits in question that is proven - with the same standard of proof applied in U. S. civil courts - to actually exist and to currently contain the remains of - at least 2 people. (That is less than one tenth of one one thousandth of one percent of the alleged mass murder.)
Note: The 6 original fraudulently alleged “huge mass graves” of Treblinka II that were alleged by “authoritative eyewitnesses” and allegedly - “PROVEN” - to exist in the early show trials - MODEL - MAP - (but never proven to exist), are also included in the above reward offer. (A photo of one of these 6 fraudulently alleged “huge mass graves” can be seen - HERE.)
Also note: This reward offer, as it applies to Treblinka II, can also be claimed for each 14 pounds of cremains discovered - ANYWHERE - within the camp boundary.
https://thisisaboutscience.com/
Dude, you literally quote mined me quoting Keen to laugh, all I did was laugh, you fucking muppet.Nessie wrote: ↑Mon Jul 13, 2026 3:47 pmQuote mining is dishonest. The full quote is "Are you suggesting that because I cannot physically show you mass graves, where 800,000 corpses can be individually counted, such as the mass graves at Katyn, that means I cannot prove mass graves?"
I go on to explain why I cannot show graves like those found at Katyn;
"Because the Nazis exhumed the corpses, cremated them and reburied the remains mixed into the ground. You have been shown the surveys of the camps that identify the areas that were dug up and where large amounts of cremated remains have been found."
You cannot argue against that, so you quote mine!
