The CODOH Revisionist Forum

Democracy is 2 wolves and a sheep voting on what is for dinner, hence the founders moved away from direct democracy.

National Socialist Germany was the best solution to the miscarriage that was weimar.

If you think that in 'their' democracy you will have right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, I remind you, 'you will own nothing and you'll be happy'.

I again encourage you to read 'jewish utopia' by higger next to 'the revelation' and to recognize the parallels to the world in which we find ourselves today.

I ask you, will you take 'the mark'? Will you prostrate yourself to those who deem themselves your moral superiors? Will you sacrifice liberty and the pursuit simply to cling on to what some may refer to as life?

One by one everything you value and hold dear will be stripped from you, even the bread from your table. This will be done in the name of impossible equality, and the struggle will be continuous.

As for me and mine, I will not be submitting to the theft of everything I possess, including my life, so that a group of sadists can play at world making while treating all of mankind as a lego set with which some sky genie has given them the right to play.

I cherish the hybrid system our founding fathers forged and I feel strongly about the molestation that framework has undergone.

InuYasha wrote: ↑Thu May 22, 2025 5:54 pm Democracy is better than Nazism…

You appear to me to be under the influence of a great many false notions.

The NSDAP were a democratic political party!!!
So your statement is an oxymoron.

You seem unaware that the NSDAP came to power by following the legal, democratic process.

Hitler invented the idea of campaigning at the local level by travelling right across a nation, using air-travel.
He invented it!
NO-ONE had ever done that BEFORE Adolf Hitler did it.

And THAT is a big factor in how he DEMOCRATICALLY came to power and was so personally popular, even loved.

It was because he actually met his people and talked to them in small meetings. He actually talked to them. He didn’t read scripts written by others from a tele-prompter as today’s politicians do. He flew around the country in a small plane piloted by Hans Baur who could land in any reasonably flat field.

Consequently Hitler spoke to many thousands of people in small towns as well as the major cities. They saw him. They heard him. And what he said was from the heart and the majority found it cathartic and compelling.
Cathartic because they’d just lived through what was called ‘the Great War’ and had ever since been suffering terrible privations as a nation due to the unjust, jewish-manipulated treaty of Versailles.

PLUS his message was compelling because there was the belief they’d lost the war due to being betrayed on an international level by influential German Jews — the Dolchstoßlegende ‘stab in the back’ understanding. An understanding that was later confirmed in 1944 in the memoir of James A. Malcolm, an Armenian Jew.

“Beginning in late autumn 1916, Malcolm was involved as an initiator and negotiator in a secret agreement between the British War Cabinet and the World Zionist Organization, whereby the Zionists pledged to draw the hitherto neutral United States of America into World War I as an ally of Great Britain; in return, Great Britain pledged to secure for the Zionists access to Palestine as a Jewish homeland. The U.S. actually entered the war in April 1917, turning the Allies' fortunes in the war.
Having fulfilled their part of the bargain, the Zionists insisted on a written and binding declaration by Britain that it would now in turn secure Palestine for the Zionists. In November 1917, this assurance was finally put in writing -+ in veiled diplomatic language — and signed by Foreign Secretary Lord Balfour' to become the Balfour Declaration…”

You can read Malcolm’s ‘confession’ here, starting on page 7:
https://johannes-freiland.com/wp-conte ... eiland.pdf

Most people don’t know about any of this because most people today don’t read much history and instead derive most of their knowledge of history from Jewish-made, hollyweird fictionalised films.

Everybody goes on and on about the executions after the thwarted coup attempt in 1934 by Ernst Röhm in Operation Hummingbird
(you probably only know it by the derogatory name of ‘night of the long knives’).

And ‘historians’ also witter on relentlessly about the laws prohibiting new political parties in 1933. But few know or acknowledge that Germany had at that time only narrowly avoided a widespread civil war. Nor is it acknowledged that Germany had jewish communist agitator-revolutionaries sent from Russia like Rosa Luxembourg to deal with. In a potential civil-war situation, normal rules of democracy naturally will not apply. For example, normal democratic conventions were suspended in Britain during WW2.

InuYasha wrote: ↑Thu May 22, 2025 5:54 pm…because under it people have freedom of speech, inalienable rights, the government is accountable to the people and the state is based on the rule of law.

The victory of democracy in this case refers to the fact that the country that won the most was democratic…

Then why do you believe the NSDAP and its leaders weren’t democratic?

Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Thu May 22, 2025 9:14 am Fair point. I just noticed that Inuyasha often subtly inserts zionist propaganda as if it were self-evidently true. E.g. the false ‘news’ claiming Putin has imperialistic, world-conquest aims (he doesn’t).
Inuyasha’s assertion that there is definitely no conspiracy or plan by cliques of powerful people connected by their mutual self-identification as jews, to create a one world government, etc., (no-one can be certain of that PLUS there is considerable evidence which can be interpreted that way).

Putin is not an imperialist, he is a personalistic autocrat. There is an undeclared ideology in Russia called "Russism" or "Rashism" that began to form in the early 1990s, when Russia unleashed a war against Chechnya, where it committed brutal war crimes. Moreover, I personally saw a document in which the Russian government gave the order for the "evacuation" of the Chechen population, the so-called government order No. 1887-r. In essence, it was going to do what you revisionists believe Hitler did with the Jews - take the Chechen people as far away as possible.

This ideology was well described by Dzhokhar Dudayev in 1995, the same year he predicted that "Ukraine will clash with Russia, under irreconcilable circumstances." Even when Russia was a non-communist pro-Western state, it, unfortunately, pursued a policy of Russism.

Western right-wingers and the opposition, in their dissatisfaction with the "agenda" and "awakening", often look at Putin with admiration, not noticing how he went to the Wailing Wall, how he pretended to be a "friend of Israel and Jews". You are inconsistent, and have become victims of the propaganda of Russism.

It is Ukraine that is now fighting for European civilization, confronting the modern version of the “Mongol” or “Hunnic” horde.

Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Thu May 22, 2025 9:14 am So… back to Herr Hitler… in my view the ‘demonisation’ of anyone is unhelpful and so unwarranted.

“When we dehumanise and demonise our opponents,
we abandon the possibility of peacefully resolving our differences”
~ Nelson Mandela

In terms of immoral actions, racism and mass-murder I would argue that Adolf is obviously much less an object of censure than the leaders of the Allies, viz. Stalin, Churchill and Truman.
Stalin was by far the greater tyrant, mass-murderer and psychopath.
Churchill comes a close second being a self-confessed lover of war, a self-confessed white supremacist who approved of genocide for “superior” white man lebensraum, plus was a high-functioning alcoholic and a pawn of wealthy Jewish bankers in America.
Truman committed the two worst acts of terrorism and mass-murder in the known history of the human race, viz. the bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima.

I admit that the Allies were also morally evil, even though they did not start the war and were not worse than the Axis. However, in September 1939 and December 1941 respectively, situations were created in which it was difficult for Germany and Japan to avoid direct confrontation.

The point is that what made Hitler absolutely evil was not just racism and prejudice, but the desire to exterminate entire peoples without any right to forgiveness (not only Jews, but Gypsies, Serbs, Poles, Ukrainians, Russians, Belarusians), or to enslave them (Plan Ost). Hideki Tojo became a similar evil for Asia, since he "started the Pacific War" and under his leadership war crimes unseen since the St. Bartholomew's Day massacre were committed (the Emperor was a figurehead). He was tried and hanged by the Americans.

If we assume that the Holocaust is a fake, then the main reason for demonizing the Axis powers disappears. The Second World War from a war of light against darkness, similar to Tolkien's stories (they are partly based on the propaganda of WWI and WWII, even though he denied it), becomes an ordinary conflict, "just" a confrontation between two predatory imperialist blocs that pursued their own interests.

Then the question arises - what are these US military bases in Germany, Italy and Japan for? Why should the Germans repent for the Holocaust if it did not happen? All the victims of concentration camps were fairly paid, why pay tribute to a country that did not even exist during WWII? Why are Japanese "historians" and "politicians" silent about Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and put up with violence, including sexual violence, by American soldiers on Okinawa against civilians (real cases that made it into the news)?

In other words, the consensus is this: Hitler and partly Tojo-Hirohito carried out a policy of extermination of peoples, and with unprecedented cruelty. They are absolute evil. The revisionists are trying to break the consensus. But if this happens, Pandora's box will open.

HansHill wrote: ↑Thu May 22, 2025 8:35 am While nobody enjoys a pol infographic more than me, we should probably keep this thread to Adolf Hitler, his demonisation, and the reasons why this is merited or not! FWIW Inuyasha doesn't strike me as Jewish, but rather a progressive on the somewhat extreme end, and acknowledges the holocaust is fake / exaggerated.

Its also possible he is very young, and the old grizzled bastard you see before you in Hans Hill didn't always believe in the JQ either, so there is that.

No, I am not Jewish and do not identify myself as such. I don't understand why the absence of the Holocaust means that Jews should be hated?

The Jewish conspiracy you speak of here and there is a strong exaggeration based on the fact that there are Jews in the leadership of various countries. Yes, they are there. This does not mean that they are deliberately leading Europe/the World to disaster, or that they rule the world.

Moreover, if you believe that the settlement of migrants, multiculturalism, demilitarization and political humiliation of European countries are carried out by Jews - then the question arises - are they stupid? If Europe is full of Arabs and other Muslims, it will simply become anti-Israel. It looks like a postponed suicide.

You, just like the exterminationists, commit the error of doublethink, on the one hand "the Jews are so cunning that they seize power in all countries", on the other "they are so stupid that they do not see the consequences of their actions". (Exterminationists say the Holocaust was kept "a closely guarded secret," but at the same time that the Nazis "spoke openly about it here and there.")

Stubble wrote: ↑Thu May 22, 2025 6:40 pm Democracy is 2 wolves and a sheep voting on what is for dinner, hence the founders moved away from direct democracy.

National Socialist Germany was the best solution to the miscarriage that was weimar.

If you think that in 'their' democracy you will have right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, I remind you, 'you will own nothing and you'll be happy'.

I again encourage you to read 'jewish utopia' by higger next to 'the revelation' and to recognize the parallels to the world in which we find ourselves today.

I ask you, will you take 'the mark'? Will you prostrate yourself to those who deem themselves your moral superiors? Will you sacrifice liberty and the pursuit simply to cling on to what some may refer to as life?

One by one everything you value and hold dear will be stripped from you, even the bread from your table. This will be done in the name of impossible equality, and the struggle will be continuous.

As for me and mine, I will not be submitting to the theft of everything I possess, including my life, so that a group of sadists can play at world making while treating all of mankind as a lego set with which some sky genie has given them the right to play.

I cherish the hybrid system our founding fathers forged and I feel strongly about the molestation that framework has undergone.

By "their" democracy you probably mean "Jewish plutocracy"?

But what you mean has nothing to do with democracy and freedom. It's just a modern version of slavery or serfdom.

In a real democracy you have separation of powers, you can express your beliefs without fear of repression. A truly free state - independent of significant forms of external influence.

I am not going to sacrifice freedom for some external masters, whatever they are called. And I am not going to submit to "them", whoever they are.

I only stand for freedom for all nations. That is why I believe it is important to stop demonizing Germany and Japan as soon as possible, to give them real sovereignty, and not its illusion, as it has been for the last 80 years.

In your America, 1% of the population is already disenfranchised and is perceived as little better than the witches of the Middle Ages. This is mass madness, which has been steadily increasing since the late 1970s.

So is there real freedom anywhere? Rather, it is an ideal to strive for.

Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Thu May 22, 2025 6:50 pm

InuYasha wrote: ↑Thu May 22, 2025 5:54 pm Democracy is better than Nazism…

You appear to me to be under the influence of a great many false notions.

The NSDAP were a democratic political party!!!
So your statement is an oxymoron.

You seem unaware that the NSDAP came to power by following the legal, democratic process.

Hitler invented the idea of campaigning at the local level by travelling right across a nation, using air-travel.
He invented it!
NO-ONE had ever done that BEFORE Adolf Hitler did it.

And THAT is a big factor in how he DEMOCRATICALLY came to power and was so personally popular, even loved.

It was because he actually met his people and talked to them in small meetings. He actually talked to them. He didn’t read scripts written by others from a tele-prompter as today’s politicians do. He flew around the country in a small plane piloted by Hans Baur who could land in any reasonably flat field.

Consequently Hitler spoke to many thousands of people in small towns as well as the major cities. They saw him. They heard him. And what he said was from the heart and the majority found it cathartic and compelling.
Cathartic because they’d just lived through what was called ‘the Great War’ and had ever since been suffering terrible privations as a nation due to the unjust, jewish-manipulated treaty of Versailles.

PLUS his message was compelling because there was the belief they’d lost the war due to being betrayed on an international level by influential German Jews — the Dolchstoßlegende ‘stab in the back’ understanding. An understanding that was later confirmed in 1944 in the memoir of James A. Malcolm, an Armenian Jew.

“Beginning in late autumn 1916, Malcolm was involved as an initiator and negotiator in a secret agreement between the British War Cabinet and the World Zionist Organization, whereby the Zionists pledged to draw the hitherto neutral United States of America into World War I as an ally of Great Britain; in return, Great Britain pledged to secure for the Zionists access to Palestine as a Jewish homeland. The U.S. actually entered the war in April 1917, turning the Allies' fortunes in the war.
Having fulfilled their part of the bargain, the Zionists insisted on a written and binding declaration by Britain that it would now in turn secure Palestine for the Zionists. In November 1917, this assurance was finally put in writing -+ in veiled diplomatic language — and signed by Foreign Secretary Lord Balfour' to become the Balfour Declaration…”

You can read Malcolm’s ‘confession’ here, starting on page 7:
https://johannes-freiland.com/wp-conte ... eiland.pdf

Most people don’t know about any of this because most people today don’t read much history and instead derive most of their knowledge of history from Jewish-made, hollyweird fictionalised films.

Everybody goes on and on about the executions after the thwarted coup attempt in 1934 by Ernst Röhm in Operation Hummingbird
(you probably only know it by the derogatory name of ‘night of the long knives’).

And ‘historians’ also witter on relentlessly about the laws prohibiting new political parties in 1933. But few know or acknowledge that Germany had at that time only narrowly avoided a widespread civil war. Nor is it acknowledged that Germany had jewish communist agitator-revolutionaries sent from Russia like Rosa Luxembourg to deal with. In a potential civil-war situation, normal rules of democracy naturally will not apply. For example, normal democratic conventions were suspended in Britain during WW2.

InuYasha wrote: ↑Thu May 22, 2025 5:54 pm…because under it people have freedom of speech, inalienable rights, the government is accountable to the people and the state is based on the rule of law.

The victory of democracy in this case refers to the fact that the country that won the most was democratic…

Then why do you believe the NSDAP and its leaders weren’t democratic?

The NSDAP was not a democratic party. It was a Führer party that sought to establish a dictatorship, albeit, strangely enough, by democratic means. It achieved its goal.

Even if Hitler had come to power in democratic elections, what followed was an almost instantaneous transformation of Germany into a totalitarian dictatorship.

He was certainly a charismatic leader who knew how to win people over to his side. Without him, there would have been no NS ideology, or Third Reich. German soldiers would not have gone on violent attacks in the last days of the war, there would have been no heroic defense of Breslau - a kind of "German Stalingrad" that outlived Hitler himself and the Berlin garrison.

A kind of bloodless National Socialist revolution of 1933. Germany was not "under threat of civil war" when the AH came to power. A significant number of Germans, it seems, actually supported Hitler, and the rest fell silent. Including the communists. Those who did not fall silent went to concentration camps or were killed. Although Thälmann (leader of the German Communists), for example, lived through almost the entire NS period, and died under unclear circumstances in 1944. If the threat had been so great, the Communists could have staged an uprising and killed Hitler. But they simply... resigned themselves to his rise to power.

Georg Elser, the failed assassin of the AH, also lived through almost the entire war, before he was assassinated by Hitler in April 1945. This is the same process of radicalization of the regime that began after Germany's military failures. Most likely, without the war, both would have survived.

The problem with the Weimar Republic was that it did not have stable institutions to protect against usurpation. Anyone could effectively seize power in such a country, and the state would not be able to remove him. So you could be a democratically elected leader at the beginning, and become a dictator later, strengthening your position in the country.

The Third Reich was not a free state - you could not express your views without the risk of getting a visit from the Gestapo. There were no free elections after the revolution either, and parliament became nothing more than an expression of Hitler's interests. The Führerprinciple directly contradicts democracy.

InuYasha wrote: ↑Thu May 22, 2025 7:06 pm No, I am not Jewish and do not identify myself as such.

The Jewish conspiracy you speak of here and there is a strong exaggeration based on the fact that there are Jews in the leadership of various countries. Yes, they are there. This does not mean that they are… leading Europe/the World…, or that they rule the world.

Moreover, if you believe that the settlement of migrants, multiculturalism, demilitarization and political humiliation of European countries are carried out by Jews — then the question arises — are they stupid? If Europe is full of Arabs and other Muslims, it will simply become anti-Israel. It looks like a postponed suicide.

You, just like the exterminationists, commit the error of doublethink, on the one hand "the Jews are so cunning that they seize power in all countries", on the other "they are so stupid that they do not see the consequences of their actions". (Exterminationists say the Holocaust was kept "a closely guarded secret," but at the same time that the Nazis "spoke openly about it here and there.")

That is a similar false justification to the one that argues: ‘how can International Jewry which controls world finance, big banks and runs capitalism ALSO be the primary force behind anti-capitalist communism.

And yet Jewish capitalist banker Jacob Schiff did contribute to the fall of the Russian Czarist, capitalist regime and DID help sponsor the Communist Bolshevik Russian Revolution. FACT!

…the Bolshevik revolution actually was financed by wealthy financiers in London and New York. Lenin and Trotsky were on the closest of terms with these moneyed interests both before and after the Revolution.

… In the 3rd February 1949 issue of the New York Journal, American Schiff’s grandson, John, was quoted by columnist Cholly Knickerbocker as saying that his grandfather had given about $20 million for the triumph of Communism in Russia.

I don’t mean to be insulting but please be informed that your argument above is a classic failure of logic and it has a name: ‘argument from incredulity’.
Basically, just because we personally don’t understand how something ‘works’ doesn’t mean it doesn’t and can not ‘work’.

Cliques of jews definitely ARE co-operating in secret and sometimes openly in certain causes. The evidence for this is considerable. But publicising it is silenced with the catch-all ‘anti-semitic’ smear.

Do you think that Jewish-American-Swedish-Israeli jewess Barbara Spectre was lying when she admitted on Swedish TV that jews were behind the drive for multiculturalism in Europe?



Or that she was lying when she wrote these tweets:









Hitler is demonised because he recognised this phenomena in his own time and refused to be compromised or intimidated by international-jewish machinations, bribes and threats.
He is demonised because he exposed their machiavellian machinations and ultimately had to fight it. Therefore he must be discredited in order to discredit his exposure of them and their activities.
Do you see?

You appear to me to be someone who has fallen for these misrepresentations. Either that or are intentionally contributing to the promotion of them.

InuYasha wrote: ↑Thu May 22, 2025 7:18 pm

Stubble wrote: ↑Thu May 22, 2025 6:40 pm Democracy is 2 wolves and a sheep voting on what is for dinner, hence the founders moved away from direct democracy.

National Socialist Germany was the best solution to the miscarriage that was weimar.

If you think that in 'their' democracy you will have right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, I remind you, 'you will own nothing and you'll be happy'.

I again encourage you to read 'jewish utopia' by higger next to 'the revelation' and to recognize the parallels to the world in which we find ourselves today.

I ask you, will you take 'the mark'? Will you prostrate yourself to those who deem themselves your moral superiors? Will you sacrifice liberty and the pursuit simply to cling on to what some may refer to as life?

One by one everything you value and hold dear will be stripped from you, even the bread from your table. This will be done in the name of impossible equality, and the struggle will be continuous.

As for me and mine, I will not be submitting to the theft of everything I possess, including my life, so that a group of sadists can play at world making while treating all of mankind as a lego set with which some sky genie has given them the right to play.

I cherish the hybrid system our founding fathers forged and I feel strongly about the molestation that framework has undergone.

By "their" democracy you probably mean "Jewish plutocracy"?

But what you mean has nothing to do with democracy and freedom. It's just a modern version of slavery or serfdom.

In a real democracy you have separation of powers, you can express your beliefs without fear of repression. A truly free state - independent of significant forms of external influence.

I am not going to sacrifice freedom for some external masters, whatever they are called. And I am not going to submit to "them", whoever they are.

I only stand for freedom for all nations. That is why I believe it is important to stop demonizing Germany and Japan as soon as possible, to give them real sovereignty, and not its illusion, as it has been for the last 80 years.

In your America, 1% of the population is already disenfranchised and is perceived as little better than the witches of the Middle Ages. This is mass madness, which has been steadily increasing since the late 1970s.

So is there real freedom anywhere? Rather, it is an ideal to strive for.

You do a disservice to willing leftist sycophants who would gladly see my family tree erased, not because they think I am amalek, but, because they want to 'decolonize' America and the world.

That they don't understand tikkun olam and that they are 'fellow travelers' is ultimately inconsequential when the target and aim are the same.

You ignore the congruence with the state of affairs with the talmud and the influence of religious jews at your own peril.

The holodomor was 'jewish utopia' or 'the revelation' in action, even if the mark had not yet been developed.

Being non religious myself does not undo the zealotry of anyone else.

From 'you will own nothing' to 'social credit' and 'universal basic income' it is all written in their books.

This is cohencidence, not coincidence.

Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Thu May 22, 2025 7:54 pm ...

If you control both sides of the fight, you can never lose.

Pike laid this out very clearly.

'When our opposition needs a hero to rally behind, we will provide him'.

Stubble wrote: ↑Thu May 22, 2025 7:56 pm You do a disservice to willing leftist sycophants who would gladly see my family tree erased, not because they think I am amalek, but, because they want to 'decolonize' America and the world.

That they don't understand tikkun olam and that they are 'fellow travelers' is ultimately inconsequential when the target and aim are the same.

You ignore the congruence with the state of affairs with the talmud and the influence of religious jews at your own peril.

The holodomor was 'jewish utopia' or 'the revelation' in action, even if the mark had not yet been developed.

Being non religious myself does not undo the zealotry of anyone else.

From 'you will own nothing' to 'social credit' and 'universal basic income' it is all written in their books.

This is cohencidence, not coincidence.

Liberalism does not mean that your or anyone else's family will be destroyed. On the contrary, every life is important.

Religious Jews are influential because they are rich and well organized, and not because there is a "global Jewish conspiracy". If there is one, then why are there no program documents of said conspiracy?

"Social credit" and other Klaus Schwab-like constructs have nothing to do with democracy or freedom. They are widespread in countries like China. An attempt to implement them in Europe will most likely fail.

You are simply very afraid of Jews and their influence. You are afraid that Jews want to destroy the world. They would have done so long ago, if they really were the "rulers of the world".

The Holodomor was Stalin's political crime, not the result of a "Jewish conspiracy." Trotsky had fled the country by then. Lenin was dead.

InuYasha wrote: ↑Thu May 22, 2025 8:18 pm You are afraid that Jews want to destroy the world.

What a peculiar and irrational belief!

Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Thu May 22, 2025 8:21 pm

InuYasha wrote: ↑Thu May 22, 2025 8:18 pm You are afraid that Jews want to destroy the world.

What a peculiar and irrational belief!

Considering that the world has long been destroyed - it really does seem strange.

Do you hate Jews? If you had the chance, what would you do to them?

InuYasha wrote: ↑Thu May 22, 2025 8:18 pm

Stubble wrote: ↑Thu May 22, 2025 7:56 pm You do a disservice to willing leftist sycophants who would gladly see my family tree erased, not because they think I am amalek, but, because they want to 'decolonize' America and the world.

That they don't understand tikkun olam and that they are 'fellow travelers' is ultimately inconsequential when the target and aim are the same.

You ignore the congruence with the state of affairs with the talmud and the influence of religious jews at your own peril.

The holodomor was 'jewish utopia' or 'the revelation' in action, even if the mark had not yet been developed.

Being non religious myself does not undo the zealotry of anyone else.

From 'you will own nothing' to 'social credit' and 'universal basic income' it is all written in their books.

This is cohencidence, not coincidence.

Liberalism does not mean that your or anyone else's family will be destroyed. On the contrary, every life is important.

Religious Jews are influential because they are rich and well organized, and not because there is a "global Jewish conspiracy". If there is one, then why are there no program documents of said conspiracy?

"Social credit" and other Klaus Schwab-like constructs have nothing to do with democracy or freedom. They are widespread in countries like China. An attempt to implement them in Europe will most likely fail.

You are simply very afraid of Jews and their influence. You are afraid that Jews want to destroy the world. They would have done so long ago, if they really were the "rulers of the world".

The Holodomor was Stalin's political crime, not the result of a "Jewish conspiracy." Trotsky had fled the country by then. Lenin was dead.

You seem confused.

Are you familiar with V I Lenin and the kulaks?

You seem particularly uninformed regarding the holodomor.

Regardless, we are walking the thread way out of scope.

Likely time to make a jew world order thread.

And a collectivization thread, apparently.

InuYasha wrote: ↑Thu May 22, 2025 8:23 pm

Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Thu May 22, 2025 8:21 pm

InuYasha wrote: ↑Thu May 22, 2025 8:18 pm You are afraid that Jews want to destroy the world.

What a peculiar and irrational belief!

Considering that the world has long been destroyed - it really does seem strange.

Do you hate Jews? If you had the chance, what would you do to them?

Ha ha ha!

No, I don’t hate jews. Your simplistic approach is laughable if it wasn’t so dangerous.

Can you refute any of the evidence provided to you?
Please do, if you think you can.

Did you even know about Barbara Spectre,
or James A. Malcolm?
or Jacob Schiff?
or Rosa Luxembourg?

This is just the tip of an enormous ‘ice berg’.

And your response is ‘do you hate jews?’.

Which is exactly the response made when people publicise, protest against and condemn the abhorrent mass-murder of Palestinians.

Only zionist-supporting Jews do that… or paid-up shabbat-goyim, …or brainwashed, gullible minions.

Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Thu May 22, 2025 8:29 pm

InuYasha wrote: ↑Thu May 22, 2025 8:23 pm

Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Thu May 22, 2025 8:21 pm
What a peculiar and irrational belief!

Considering that the world has long been destroyed - it really does seem strange.

Do you hate Jews? If you had the chance, what would you do to them?

Ha ha ha!

No, I don’t hate jews. Your simplistic approach is laughable if it wasn’t so dangerous.

Can you refute any of the evidence provided to you?
Please do, if you think you can.

Did you even know about Barbara Spectre,
or James A. Malcolm?
or Jacob Schiff?
or Rosa Luxembourg?

This is just the tip of an enormous ‘ice berg’.

And your response is ‘do you hate jews?’.

Which is exactly the response made when people publicise, protest against and condemn the abhorrent mass-murder of Palestinians.

Only zionist-supporting Jews do that… or paid-up shabbat-goyim, …or brainwashed, gullible minions.

Many communist leaders were of Jewish origin. Trotsky, Lenin, Sverdlov, Zinoviev, Kamenev, Uritsky, Kaganovich, Litvinov, etc.

It only means that there were Jews among the Bolsheviks. Even if, as you claim, Jewish bankers supported the Bolsheviks, this is not a "conspiracy". The Jews, who were temporarily elevated by this revolution, were washed in blood in 1937, when Stalin carried out the Great Terror.

As far as I remember, one person told me that revisionists (Holocaust deniers) are stupid fanatics. Well, you are far from "stupid", on the contrary, you are even intelligent. But you represent a significant danger. A threat to freedom, to peaceful interaction of peoples. Zionists and Jewish supremacists also pose a threat to this idea. Both sides are fanatical, as I see it. It's like being stuck between two forms of evil.

Your ridicule here is completely inappropriate. I started studying the subject of revisionism not so long ago, and I was in a sense enthusiastic, because I was sure that it would shed light on history and help in the fight against injustice, will help stop this impending disaster. But it seems that I was deeply mistaken.