Re: Best case for the Holocaust.
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2026 1:16 pm
A summary of the above. I argue that,
- history is evidenced, not argued.
- the existing evidence is the best case for the Holocaust, despite what so-called revisionists think.
- attempts to revise the existing history have been abject failures, which further strengthens the first argument.
- there is a lack of evidence of a conspiracy to hoax and provided examples of where a hoax is against national interests.
- I give examples of how the evidence is strong, circumstantially, from the eyewitnesses, in terms of motive, opportunity and conduct after the crime and give some specific examples of well evidenced events.
- history is evidenced, not argued.
- the existing evidence is the best case for the Holocaust, despite what so-called revisionists think.
- attempts to revise the existing history have been abject failures, which further strengthens the first argument.
- there is a lack of evidence of a conspiracy to hoax and provided examples of where a hoax is against national interests.
- I give examples of how the evidence is strong, circumstantially, from the eyewitnesses, in terms of motive, opportunity and conduct after the crime and give some specific examples of well evidenced events.