The CODOH Revisionist Forum

[Mod note: Split from viewtopic.php?t=718 as the discussion has veered away from the Holocaust connection and more into Epstein revisionism]

I remember seeing a documentary on the Palm Beach charges and I found it to be absolutely damning. Tracey seems to be ignoring that people often get charges that are far less than what they are actually guilty of.

To be fair to Tracey, he accepts that Epstein received sexual massages for cash with teen girls, between 2002 and 2005.

Tracey's point is that Epstein's plea deal wasn't a result of leniency, but practically. A trial against Epstein was likely to fail (according to state and federal prosecutors). They had no strong witnesses willing to testify; many girls admitted to telling Epstein they were 18. Most were reluctant to testify; some were embarrassed and didn't want their parents to find out. Many girls simply liked Epstein. This is detailed in the 2020 OPR report, which journalists ignore for the most part, in favour of the argument that he just 'got off' because he was wealthy.

Epstein's lawyers had gathered the girls social media posts about sex and shoplifting. They found their criminal records. Many of them were working as strippers prior to meeting Epstein. Prosecutors felt these young women would simply collapse under cross examination and Epstein would be acquitted. It's quite possible, given Florida was prosecuting teen prostitutes at the time.

The Epstein mythology isn't about his own offending with underage girls. The mythology is that he was involving 'the elites'. But none of the girls from the original palm beach police case ever alleged the involvement of other men, cameras, or blackmail.

These more sordid allegations only arose years later... which should be a red flag given his 2019 arrest was for offending in the same period (2002 - 2005)

Allegations about Epstein mutated beginning in 2010 all the way up until his 2019 arrest. Most of this was due to one accuser – Virginia Giuffre, a fabulist and perjurer. In 2011, she was looking for a book deal. A DailyMail journalist told her to throw in the name of Alan Dershowitz into her memoir, writing "we think he's a pedo although no evidence, you probably met him". A few years later, Giuffre files a lawsuit claiming she was raped by Dershowitz on 6 occasions. After 8 years of describing these rapes in graphic detail, she dropped the whole thing in 2022 and claims she made a "mistake" in identifying him.

In her 2011 FBI interview, Giuffre could not recall ever having sex with Andrew on Epstein island, but by 2015 she suddenly has full recall of an orgy with 8 underage girls. You can find dozens of these major changes in her story. It's on Irene Zisblatt's level.

The media have just run with all of Giuffre's absurd allegations and it snowballed into a massive hysteria. The real Epstein story is a lot more boring. After Epstein's 2008 conviction he made sure to only date models over the age of 18. Some of these women are now claiming they were 'trafficked', despite being in his orbit for 8 years while he paid all their expenses, and have filed lawsuits against Bank of America for "enabling" this abuse. It's a manufactured mass hysteria that has enabled a ~1 billion wealth extraction industry, with 30% to lawyers.

PrudentRegret wrote: ↑Thu Feb 05, 2026 5:40 pm Speaking of Epstein, here's Mitch Webber, who is on the board of the United States Holocaust Memorial Council, emailing Jeffrey Epstein on the legality of transporting minors for sex:

The Webber/Epstein email is not as nefarious as you think.

This email was sent in August, 2006, when Epstein had already been charged at the state level for prostitution, and authorities were investigating potential federal trafficking charges.

Mitch Webber was a low level legal assistant to one of Epstein's lawyers. He was pinging his lawyers to look into various federal laws to defend himself.

Epstein was not asking Webber to find him places where he could have sexual contact with underage girls. In fact, even the lawyers of Epstein accusers concede there isn't good evidence that Epstein engaged in sexual activity with an underage girl after his 2008 conviction. It seems most of the corroborating evidence indicates his last offending was 2005.

mengelemyth wrote: ↑Fri Mar 20, 2026 5:43 am …Epstein received sexual massages for cash with teen girls, between 2002 and 2005.

…many girls admitted to telling Epstein they were 18.

…Many girls simply liked Epstein.

…The Epstein mythology isn't about his own offending with underage girls. The mythology is that he was involving 'the elites'. But none of the girls from the original palm beach police case ever alleged the involvement of other men, cameras, or blackmail.

These more sordid allegations only arose years later... which should be a red flag

…The media have just run with all of Giuffre's absurd allegations and it snowballed into a massive hysteria. The real Epstein story is a lot more boring.

After Epstein's 2008 conviction he made sure to only date models over the age of 18…

Ho-hum
So…
Nothing there from MM about Epstein’s ‘honeypot’ blackmail operation of the wealthy, powerful and influential.

Nothing there concerning the voluminous evidence he was a jooish Mossad agent working for Israhell.

Nothing there about the strange details of his supposed ‘suicide’while in a US prison.

Just weak arguments about his actual sexual activity being … meh… not that interesting nor even particularly ‘immoral’.

This appears to fit the profile of a ‘misinformation merchant’ as was once described here: viewtopic.php?p=21636#p21636

mengelemyth wrote: ↑Fri Mar 20, 2026 5:43 am The Epstein mythology isn't about his own offending with underage girls. The mythology is that he was involving 'the elites'. But none of the girls from the original palm beach police case ever alleged the involvement of other men, cameras, or blackmail.

These more sordid allegations only arose years later... which should be a red flag given his 2019 arrest was for offending in the same period (2002 - 2005)

Allegations about Epstein mutated beginning in 2010 all the way up until his 2019 arrest. Most of this was due to one accuser – Virginia Giuffre, a fabulist and perjurer.

This seems to accurately paraphrase Tracey's arguments, but what is the evidence for this claim? Before following Tracey, I did not have the impression that Virginia Giuffre was so important to Epstein's reputation. Most of what I had absorbed on this topic had never even mentioned her name, such that I didn't know it. As one obvious example of a prominent Epstein conspiracy theorist, Whitney Webb mentioned Giuffre in only one of her 70 articles on UR:
https://www.unz.com/?s=virginia+giuffre ... ion=Search

It wasn't until I was exposed to Tracey's repeated posts about Giuffre that I learned anything about her at all. Does he explain somewhere why she deserves to be treated as the lynchpin? For example, has it been demonstrated that other witnesses were copying her claims? Or has Tracey merely chosen to target her as the most convenient bogeyman?

Wetzelrad wrote: ↑Fri Mar 20, 2026 9:43 am

mengelemyth wrote: ↑Fri Mar 20, 2026 5:43 am
…The Epstein mythology…

…But none of the girls from the original palm beach police case ever alleged the involvement of other men, cameras, or blackmail…

This seems to accurately paraphrase Tracey's arguments, but what is the evidence for this claim?
…Most of what I had absorbed on this topic had never even mentioned her [Virginia Giuffre‘s] name, such that I didn't know it… [snip]

Who cares?

Virginia Giuffre was one of many who were paid for sex (i.e. a prostitute).
That is NOT the important thing here.

A Mossad blackmail operation FOR ZIONIST INTERESTS in order to have leverage over the rich and powerful is.

(Sheesh! )

The claim that Epstein was engaging in a blackmail operation using underage girls is weak.

That claim started with Virginia Giuffre in the 2010s, who was making allegation about experiences in the early 2000s. Her claim of 'hidden cameras' filming her was absent in her original FBI testimony. None of the ~40 girls in the original palm beach police case ever alleged the involvement of other men, blackmail or tapes... it was literally just Epstein getting off while they gave him a massage.

Then in 2016, Sarah Ransome came out of the woodwork. She was a 22 year old prostitute when she met Epstein in 2006. She claimed she actually made copies of the tapes Virginia was talking about, showing Trump, Clinton, Branson and Prince Andrew with girls.. and then 3 years later she admits she made the whole thing up. But by then the whole thing had already taken off, and it was away.

It's been a decade of Giuffre's original claim mutating. Lots of others contributed to this with their own hearsay story or rumours. Nobody can be bothered to trace through the source material and see it's all a bit illogical. People point to a handful of emails in the files and project what they want onto them (which is going to happen when you have millions of emails). There's no real smoking gun though.

That said, Epstein obviously had 'dirt' on people. He was a high profile billionaire. There's no evidence of a mass blackmail operation in which he used underage girls for that purpose. As soon as he started blackmailing, word would spread and everybody would've avoided him. That's just not how you keep friends.

As for Epstein as an 'intelligence' agent? There's a video of Epstein not knowing how to right click to save a photo on his computer. Some real high level Israeli intelligence officer. Riiight.

Some believe that Epstein, post his first conviction, might've used some of the older Russian women (who were 18-25) to seduce men and get dirt on them. I open to being convinced of this, but I haven't seen any strong evidence. This is a lot more believable, however, because these women knew Epstein was a convicted sex offender, and still pursued relationships with him. This suggests they have a greater willingness to do unethical things for money. That said, no smoking gun there.

Wetzelrad wrote: ↑Fri Mar 20, 2026 9:43 am As one obvious example of a prominent Epstein conspiracy theorist, Whitney Webb mentioned Giuffre in only one of her 70 articles on UR. It wasn't until I was exposed to Tracey's repeated posts about Giuffre that I learned anything about her at all.

Refer to my post above first. Whitney Webb does not read much material and has huge gaps in her knowledge. The fact she doesn't refer to Giuffre is itself a huge red flag. The only reason the Epstein 'intelligence' theory was posited in the first place traces back to Giuffre.

Giuffre was was the one who claimed Epstein filmed her, and later floated theories of blackmail. It was then further developed into a full scale theory about blackmail operation on social media. Then when Epstein died, somebody in the Trump White House (most likely Steve Bannon) told the DailyBeast a hearsay story about Alexander Acosta allegedly saying that Epstein "belonged to intelligence".

One person set off the satanic panic with her allegations, it's not hard for me to accept that one Virginia Giuffre could contaminate the field and encourage others to posit theories of an intelligence operation... there are actually very few women involved with Epstein who have made allegations of blackmail/cameras (Virginia, and Sarah Ransome, who are both proven fabulists).

mengelemyth wrote: ↑Fri Mar 20, 2026 5:43 am To be fair to Tracey, he accepts that Epstein received sexual massages for cash with teen girls, between 2002 and 2005.

Tracey's point is that Epstein's plea deal wasn't a result of leniency, but practically. A trial against Epstein was likely to fail (according to state and federal prosecutors). They had no strong witnesses willing to testify; many girls admitted to telling Epstein they were 18. Most were reluctant to testify; some were embarrassed and didn't want their parents to find out. Many girls simply liked Epstein. This is detailed in the 2020 OPR report, which journalists ignore for the most part, in favour of the argument that he just 'got off' because he was wealthy.

Hi MM, welcome to the forum. I am open to hearing you out on this and am admittedly inexpert on this topic, but I am skeptical of Tracey's seeming attempt to whitewash Epstein.

In the documentary I saw, they recruited the girls from the local schools so I'm not buying that he thought they were 18.

I have not read this 2020 report, but I wouldn't necessarily take that as gospel. If Krishner did let Epstein off easy there might be some desire to cover that up.

Epstein's lawyers had gathered the girls social media posts about sex and shoplifting. They found their criminal records. Many of them were working as strippers prior to meeting Epstein. Prosecutors felt these young women would simply collapse under cross examination and Epstein would be acquitted. It's quite possible, given Florida was prosecuting teen prostitutes at the time.

This is not at all what I recall from the documentary. Young girls, recruited from schools, obviously under 18, offered cash to give massages. Some of the parents noticed their daughters with suspicious amounts of cash. They were very angry at the lack of prosecution.

It's not like they are going to admit that the case is strong and then decline to prosecute.

The Epstein mythology isn't about his own offending with underage girls. The mythology is that he was involving 'the elites'. But none of the girls from the original palm beach police case ever alleged the involvement of other men, cameras, or blackmail.

These more sordid allegations only arose years later... which should be a red flag given his 2019 arrest was for offending in the same period (2002 - 2005)

Allegations about Epstein mutated beginning in 2010 all the way up until his 2019 arrest. Most of this was due to one accuser – Virginia Giuffre, a fabulist and perjurer. In 2011, she was looking for a book deal. A DailyMail journalist told her to throw in the name of Alan Dershowitz into her memoir, writing "we think he's a pedo although no evidence, you probably met him". A few years later, Giuffre files a lawsuit claiming she was raped by Dershowitz on 6 occasions. After 8 years of describing these rapes in graphic detail, she dropped the whole thing in 2022 and claims she made a "mistake" in identifying him.

In her 2011 FBI interview, Giuffre could not recall ever having sex with Andrew on Epstein island, but by 2015 she suddenly has full recall of an orgy with 8 underage girls. You can find dozens of these major changes in her story. It's on Irene Zisblatt's level.

The media have just run with all of Giuffre's absurd allegations and it snowballed into a massive hysteria. The real Epstein story is a lot more boring. After Epstein's 2008 conviction he made sure to only date models over the age of 18. Some of these women are now claiming they were 'trafficked', despite being in his orbit for 8 years while he paid all their expenses, and have filed lawsuits against Bank of America for "enabling" this abuse. It's a manufactured mass hysteria that has enabled a ~1 billion wealth extraction industry, with 30% to lawyers.

Has Tracey (or anybody) addressed Epstein's suspicious finances? How he doesn't seem to have been doing any trading whatsoever? Why did Wexner give him an enormous mansion in Manhattan? It seems he had backers.

There's also Ghislaine's father, Robert Maxwell. Quite independently of this Epstein stuff, Maxwell is widely believed to have been an Israeli spy. That's suggestive to me.