The CODOH Revisionist Forum

Unsure if this topic has been initiated before, apologies if it has.



I have been experimenting with the usecase for AI image generation for Holocaust Revisionist purposes, this is a good example. Interested to see where this could be taken, and the possible implications for this approach used at scale!

This is a render of the alleged wood ash expected at Treblinka given certain assumptions - inputs taken from Mattogno. I think the image speaks for itself

When we were debating the Kula columns with bombsaway and he was trying to explain his Rube Goldberg theories, it got me wondering whether we could simulate some of this stuff visually with AI tools. A lot of times with these debates, I think a lot of us can "see" the issues in our hands, but when explaining it to others in language everything is not always as clear as it should be.

viewtopic.php?t=774

In Denierbud's videos, one of his main techniques was simply to portray the story visually. This is very effective. But it's also hard to do and labor intensive. As this gets easier and easier, we should be able to take better advantage of visuals.

Colorizing old b&w photos helps expose details that can be difficult to discern otherwise.

"Treblinka" "revolt" photo taken by Zygmunt Wierzbowski (a random person no one knows anything about)

Spoiler

"Last" Jew of "Vinnitsa" (actually Berdychiv)

Spoiler

Archie wrote: ↑Fri May 29, 2026 12:37 pm In Denierbud's videos, one of his main techniques was simply to portray the story visually. This is very effective. But it's also hard to do and labor intensive. As this gets easier and easier, we should be able to take better advantage of visuals.

Rachel Auerbach wrote a "screenplay outline" of the Treblinka Revolt, as well as a radio play that could be turned into a series of photos/videos. I haven't played around with AI image generation for story boarding a project like that.

Portraying literal interpretations of eyewitness accounts could expose the schlock inherent in some of them. Attempting to connect them all together would also highlight the contradictions.

• Himmler's visit to a single camp, reported in every single month for seven straight months
• wild beatings and shouting, followed by calming speeches for which Jews applaud, followed by wild beatings, followed by orderly handing over of currency in exchange for a receipt, followed by merciless beatings and shouting, followed by a calming speech, followed by shouting and beatings
• a band drowning out the sound of wild beatings and shoutings, screaming bathhouse victims, the relentless sound of excavators digging up the ground, and giant burning mounds of corpses

With how much nudity is in them, though, I'm not sure where they could be posted. And nudity is such a consistent theme in eyewitness testimony that it couldn't be entirely excluded.

Probably why most death camp hagiographies only quote a sentence or two at a time from each witness.

HansHill wrote: ↑Fri May 29, 2026 11:42 am This is a render of the alleged wood ash expected at Treblinka given certain assumptions - inputs taken from Mattogno. I think the image speaks for itself

In my opinion that volume would be much bigger than the AI drew it. Here is the same volume visualized next to a standard 40ft shipping container, which is about the same length as a London red bus, using CBM Calculator.


The square volume is 12x the container's height. Or about 7x the height of a London red bus.

Therefore I think the pile of ashes in your AI depiction is too small. By rough estimate, it should be 3x bigger than shown.

A group called Truth Nuke Media has done some work with AI-generated video recently. They put out a series of videos on Holocaust absurdities.



These are decidedly less serious and less technical than what we discuss here. Still, it's a good proof of how AI can work.

Archie wrote: ↑Fri May 29, 2026 12:37 pm In Denierbud's videos, one of his main techniques was simply to portray the story visually. This is very effective. But it's also hard to do and labor intensive. As this gets easier and easier, we should be able to take better advantage of visuals.

Agreed - one of the best parts from the One Third documentary was the demonstration of the pig carcass cremation. I have clip-farmed it for showing others how preposterous the claims are! https://holocausthandbooks.com/video/on ... holocaust/

Wetzelrad wrote: ↑Fri May 29, 2026 5:22 pm
Therefore I think the pile of ashes in your AI depiction is too small. By rough estimate, it should be 3x bigger than shown.

Very interesting. Its possible the AI either generated a typical hallucination as we know can tend to happen, or more sinister, the key variables of the prompt triggered a holocaust guardrail, for example by recognizing the inputs from the source material, and purposely lowballed the pile size in the image. If i had to guess, i tend to favor the former. The latter would likely be met with outright refusal rather than a lowballed ash pile - it's damning enough, even if it's understated!

I have re-run it again using different models and it gives ash piles of slightly different sizes but nothing on the scale of your model!

Well, I think estimating weights or volumes by photos is a tough business and not one that AI is specifically trained for. Who knows what it's doing under the hood? Perhaps it has been trained on photos of sand and gravel piles, which could be described in terms of tonnage rather than volume, and based on your given figure of "11,100 metric tonnes" it creates a depiction of ash in line with sand and gravel despite ash actually being (maybe) half as dense.

Maybe this could be solved with a different prompt, one with different descriptions like length and width, but probably AI will chronically struggle with this problem. This problem is outside its training. Its training, being made up primarily of real photos, will bias it towards reality, whereas the Holocaust is not realistic.

Wetzelrad wrote: ↑Sat May 30, 2026 7:07 pm the Holocaust is not realistic.

Wetzelrad wrote: ↑Sat May 30, 2026 7:07 pm ...This problem is outside its training. Its training, being made up primarily of real photos...

This reminds me of the red wine problem. Early LLM models struggled to produce an image of a glass of red wine full to the brim. As this would not be common practice, and therefore it would be unusual to see, it was likely omitted from its training database, despite being a seemingly reasonable request. So what you are saying has merit. however this does seem to have been patched since.

I'd like to see an AI video Irene Zisblatt being throw over a fence, across a railroad yard, into an open train car.