The CODOH Revisionist Forum

Just to shine further light on the complete farce this statement is, I have highlighted the nonsense and absurdities so no one is left in any doubt that what she is saying is total bollocks. Almost as hilarious is what she didn't say but I'll let your imagination think that through for fun... On ...

The real capacity of the ovens is not even evidenced by the historiography of the Holocaust, and it comes with this pomp of authority. :) The truth is that the historiography of the Holocaust lacks everything. If the defendants were tried in a court under positive law, they would all be acquitted ...

In the same way that exterminationists cling to the Nazi conspiracy to destroy evidence without any evidence of it, anyone can argue that the Allies, already with their minds made up about the genocide of Jews in the middle of the war, before any in-depth forensic investigation, ordered the ...

Except, he wasn't. Despite knowing they were being accused of mass murder in death camps, Himmler did nothing to produce evidence that was not true and of millions of Jews still alive in camps and ghettos in 1944-5, evidence of which would have ended the mass murder claims instantly. The Nazis ...

And he's doubling down. He is seriously claiming that Himmler is "irrelevant" as a witness because he didn't personally work in the Kremas. Hilarious. Nessie, a basic principle of source criticism is, "The reliability of a given source is relative to the questions put to it." The question raised ...

You know that, yet you still regard all witnesses as equal. :? Neither Himmler nor Vrba were eyewitnesses, so their use as witnesses is very limited. How do you still not understand that? How do you classify an eyewitness? Because you were alive during the events? Or because historiography has ...

Wasn't Himmler the one Vrba said saw a gassing on site at Birkenau in 1943?

HansHill wrote: ↑Mon Apr 28, 2025 3:42 pm
Are you the same guy prattling on about convergence all the time? In any other example you always defer to authority, except when Archie presented the Himmler quote, you disregard it. Curious!

Nazis being in favor of the prosecution is true, but if they are against it, then they are liars.

Jewish archaeology is only recognized by themselves. Jesus was found in the Talpiot Tomb and James Cameron Jacobovici proved it.

They hold a monopoly on what anti-Semitism is, so of course they will manipulate their own data to continue blackmailing privilege and influence.

There was also consensus that there was luminiferous ether, geocentrism, spontaneous generation, and a flat Earth.

The Kremas in AB were morgues, the one in Stammlager, due to the abandonment of its cremation, served as an air raid shelter. The ones in Majdanek were clearly delousing chambers as there are visible signs of Prussian Blue in them. The exterminationists claim that they were gas chambers in Majdanek ...

Will exterminationists always cling to the Deutsche Bahn transport list and ask for proof of where they went? So they don't need to explain how it was technically possible.

All that's missing is for Nessie to say that the Nazis willingly went to these trials to condemn themselves.

Yes, because he was a Polish historian who had to toe the party line. As soon as the SU collapsed, he could and did move to the more accurate, better researched western death tolls. But he continued to maintain the highest possible calculations even with subsequent revisions, that is, these people ...