Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?

For more adversarial interactions
User avatar
Wahrheitssucher
Posts: 357
Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 2:51 pm

Re: Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?

Post by Wahrheitssucher »

bombsaway wrote: Tue Jul 15, 2025 2:00 pm
Wahrheitssucher wrote: Tue Jul 15, 2025 1:52 pm Are the "graves" proven to not exist?
Are "unicorns" proven to not exist?”

Both use the same logic. Do you agree?
No lol, I think there is credible evidence…
Erm… Ok. :?
You have confirmed that the problem is that you DO have an unfortunate comprehension disability.

LAST ATTEMPT TO ASSIST YOU:
You weren’t asked if there was ‘evidence’ for either.
You were asked to compare the logic being used in two sentences, arguing for existence of both unicorns and the alleged mass-graves.
A ‘holocaust’ believer’s problem is not technical, factual, empirical or archeological — their problem is psychological.
b
bombsaway
Posts: 1154
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 2:23 am

Re: Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?

Post by bombsaway »

Wahrheitssucher wrote: Tue Jul 15, 2025 3:16 pm
bombsaway wrote: Tue Jul 15, 2025 2:00 pm
Wahrheitssucher wrote: Tue Jul 15, 2025 1:52 pm Are the "graves" proven to not exist?
Are "unicorns" proven to not exist?”

Both use the same logic. Do you agree?
No lol, I think there is credible evidence…
Erm… Ok. :?
You have confirmed that the problem is that you DO have an unfortunate comprehension disability.

LAST ATTEMPT TO ASSIST YOU:
You weren’t asked if there was ‘evidence’ for either.
You were asked to compare the logic being used in two sentences, arguing for existence of both unicorns and the alleged mass-graves.
I don't use the "proven to not exist" as an argument for why mass graves exist. What i was trying to convey was that keens questionnaire was pointless.
K
Keen
Posts: 317
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?

Post by Keen »

bombsaway wrote: Mon Jul 14, 2025 10:02 pm So what? Are the "graves" proven to not exist?
Yes:
CONCLUSION / STATEMENT OF FACT: Applying legal standards used in U.S. courts along with the information presented on this website, Greg Gerdes has LEGALLY PROVEN that the above alleged “huge mass grave discoveries” are fraudulent charades, the Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II mass murder / holocaust allegations are false, and the orthodox holocaust story did not happen as alleged.

NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE - PROVES - NO MASS MURDER

Additionally, and independent of any other reward offered on this website, a reward of - $5,000.00 - will be remitted to anyone who can refute the above conclusion / statement of fact in a publicized debate against Greg Gerdes. Rules are essentially the same as those for the other challenges on this site. Contact Greg Gerdes for details.

http://thisisaboutscience.com/
K
Keen
Posts: 317
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?

Post by Keen »

bombsaway wrote: Tue Jul 15, 2025 1:37 pm There's evidence of the graves
There is no clear, convincing or credible evidence.

*10 - Is it - True. - or - False. - that; The largest (in terms of quantity of remains) of the one hundred graves / cremation pits in question at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II, in which verified human remains have been tangibly located via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology, is - THIS SOBIBOR GRAVE - ??

Image
Last edited by Keen on Mon Jul 28, 2025 3:18 pm, edited 2 times in total.
K
Keen
Posts: 317
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Tue Jul 15, 2025 1:07 pm You reject evidence of mass graves
Liar.

*10 - Is it - True. - or - False. - that; The largest (in terms of quantity of remains) of the one hundred graves / cremation pits in question at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II, in which verified human remains have been tangibly located via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology, is - THIS SOBIBOR GRAVE - ??

Image
Post Reply