Stubble wrote: ↑Thu Dec 11, 2025 4:12 pm
I had started at 10% of the alleged tally based on physical grave space projected by Kola.
I have amended my position to roughly 5,000 persons maximum buried at the alleged mass murder site based on review of the digs. I readily admit that this could be further drawn downward if the remains were actually quantified and found to be even less, which I consider to be very likely.
This is not 'The Revisionist Position' but merely my own personal assessment of the data as it has come down to us.
Callafangers:
you will need to at least take on the largest graves and make some attempt to estimate what is actually there, based on the descriptions provided between Kola/Mazurek.
...please quantify what you are saying.
This is easy work. The fact that you do not do it is transparent to anyone reading this thread. You are making the 'Holocaust' establishment look very weak and indefensible by your inability or unwillingness to even attempt to quantify, here.
Please take note of Callafangers gross hypocricy.
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
Stubble wrote: ↑Sat Dec 13, 2025 5:46 pm
Keen, I think 'The Revisionist Position' on Sobibor is the one outlined by Mattogno in the Holocaust Handbook by that name.
Callafangers:
you will need to at least take on the largest graves and make some attempt to estimate what is actually there, based on the descriptions provided between Kola/Mazurek.
...please quantify what you are saying.
This is easy work. The fact that you do not do it is transparent to anyone reading this thread. You are making the 'Holocaust' establishment look very weak and indefensible by your inability or unwillingness to even attempt to quantify, here.
If the physical evidence for a claim that - HAS TO EXIST - in order for the claim to be true - DOES NOT EXIST - then that claim is false.
