Here's the answer to your question Archie

[Keen]

Archie:

Regarding the Kola study specifically... If you say that Kola faked the samples, this can come off as an admission that the reported results are somehow damaging to revisionism.

Why do that when it is not damaging?

https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=16363#p16363

Note: The question was asked about Belzec, but it applies to Sobibor as well.

Well Archie, compare this:

Callafangers:

I would concede a maximum of some ~40-50,000 [dead and burried] at Sobibor

https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=18609#p18609

To this:

Callafangers:

Here is mine [for Sobibor] (range goes from what I consider "reasonable minimum" to "absolute maximum"):

2,702 - 17,010

From 40-50,000 to 2,702 - 17,010 - that is a significant reduction, don't you think Archie?

See what happens when you focus on getting to the truth rather than trying to win arguments?

And even these lower figures Callafangers cravenly refuses to defend. (He's still running from Mr. Gerdes like a scared little girl.)

And why don't you ask Stubble what his once 25,000 figure is now down to?

And why don't you ask Callafangers why he's so afraid to answer the latest simple question that has been posed to him:

https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=21229#p21229

Perhaps you will anwer the question for us if Callafangers continues to cravenly refuse???