ResearcherGuy wrote: ↑Thu Feb 26, 2026 5:48 am
…I've also heard an additional argument that the tracked number of Jews in the report (1,274,166, confirmed by Höfle Telegram), never showed up anywhere else, which may construe their demise.
You might be interested to know that the REALITY regarding the Höfle telegram is that it is almost certainly
bogus.
It is claimed to supposedly be the ONLY deciphered message that was ever intercepted concerning the alleged programme to mass-murder all of the 11 million jewish people in ALL of Europe and mentioned in the Wannsee protocol.
We are asked to believe that the Third Reich high-command and their ‘Endlösung’ operatives NEVER sent any other unequivocal messages — neither by paper nor by coded messages — about such a huge operation! NOTHING! Not one other message or order supposedly could be found in all the many tons of captured documents and hundreds-of-thousands of secret-code messages that were intercepted.
You would have to have a self-delusional ‘belief’ in the Holocaust mass-gassing ‘Jew genocide’ narrative to think that makes sense.
Raul Hilberg is the only HolyH, mass-gassing believer who had the honesty to admit that absence doesn’t make sense. And to to explain the absence of written orders he invented the explanation that the whole policy and all the necessary logistical issues were sorted using
telepathic ‘mind-reading’. *
*
“But what began in 1941 was a process of destruction not planned in advance, not organized centrally by any agency. There was no blueprint and there was no budget for destructive measures. They [these measures] were taken step by step, one step at a time.
Thus came about not so much a plan being carried out, but an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus — mind-reading by a far-flung bureaucracy.”
~ Raul Hilberg
Even the Höfle telegram itself — if it is genuine — is not unequivocally referring to the supposed programme to mass-murder 11 million Jews. It needs ‘interpreting’.
Both i.) the numbers have to be adjusted to fit,
AND ii.) what the initials supposedly represent have to be interpreted RETROACTIVELY to fit the belief-system.
That has been gone into here:
https://rodoh.info/post/3473
Another anomaly pointing to this being a forgery is that Höfle’s name is spelt not as it would have been in a German transmission using German alphabet on a German typewriter but is spelt without an umlaut. I.e. it is spelt as Anglicised ‘Hoefle’.
To decrypt the intercepts required an Enigma machine AND a German typewriter with keys for the German letters ö ü ä.
You will see that these letters of the German alphabet
are used elsewhere by the decrypting team.
So presumably the forgers did not know that
Höfle was how his name was spelt, not the Anglicised ”
Hoefle”.
The files were archived, kept secret and not “declassified” and made available to researchers/historians until the late 1990s. Most documents held by the PRO used to be kept "closed" (or secret) for 50 years after being archived there. That changed to 30 years after 1967. So as usual, this imbecile doesn’t know what he is talking about.
OBVIOUSLY, it isn’t being suggested that “a typist back in January 1943 faked the message”.
IF the filed Höfle message
IS a forgery, it would have been created and inserted shortly before or after the files were declassified and made accessible to the public in the late 1990s.
It is claimed to have been an extremely lucky find made in the year 2000.
And the motivation for the forgery — IF this is what occurred — would appear to have been in order to support the increasingly beleaguered and collapsing HolyH mass-gassing mythology.
Further implication that it is a convincing forgery seems to me to be the slim likelihood of it just being randomly discovered out of all the several hundreds of thousands of decrypted intercepts, so soon after they were declassified. A reasonable, rational person would be aware that the ’discovery’ was either extremely ’lucky’ and/or very unlikely.
As I understand it, the ones who made public the ‘discovery’ of it are Peter Witte and Stephen Tyas. Presumably one of them ‘found’ it.
But in their publication they don’t mention who found it, nor how (whichever of them supposedly did) just happened upon this particular intercept amongst the many, many thousands.
This fact alone should make any reasonable person suspicious.
There are 101 archives of files, and each one contains several thousands of decrypted intercepts.
So who found it and how did they come across it? And how did they understand the significance of it?
But nobody dare question things like this. Most everybody in the world knows nothing about this kind of detail, and so just gullibly and obediently ’believe’ what they are told to believe.
As we all know, for a historian to publically question in this way would be career-suicide. The only academics and publishing historians who question any of this HolyH-narrative have been ostracised and smeared.
Look what happened to Prof Nolte, Prof. Faurisson, Prof Hayward, Henri Roques, Germar Rudolf and David Irving for proof of that.
SUMMARY:
So the Höfle telegram is yet another good example of just how weak the actual ‘evidence’ is for this ‘belief-system’. It’s up there alongside us being expected to believe that the whole operation was planned and executed using ‘euphemisms’, yet simultaneously we are expected to believe that Hitler OPENLY wrote about his ‘genocide’ plan in ‘Mein kampf’ and even declared it to the world in recorded public broadcasts.
Yeah, sure. That makes complete sense... not!
https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/wp- ... hlight.jpg
do we (through our own Hollywood-fueled biases) jump immediately to thinking (or accepting) every vague term or phrase is a Nazi cover-up for 'gassing'... because we all know just how evil those Nazis were. Didn't you see Schindler's List, after all?
