You're welcome, Stub.
Both videos are good for newbies.Eye of Zyclone wrote: ↑Thu Apr 16, 2026 9:57 pmThis one, made by the same guy, seems even more on topic. And much shorter.
Perhaps you could try to fool AI with some veiled revisionism by suggesting to it that the alleged Nazi shrunken heads conveniently vanished and were never scientifically analyzed and that the making of such shrunken heads would have been impossible without the secret decoction of Amazonian plants and complicated process used by Jivaro master head-shrinkers for that purpose.









Searching for shrunken heads, I came upon this image from 1938, just thought it seemed a bit similar to these so called Buchenwald heads?The specific shrunken head in your image (the one presented as Exhibit USA-254 by prosecutor Thomas J. Dodd at the Nuremberg trials on December 13, 1945) has not been proven fake. https://x.com/i/grok/share/24a5b1718930 ... aaa41fd08f

They're not the same head, if that's what you're suggesting. If you compare to frontal photos of the Nuremberg head (like this one) you can see that the 1938 head's nose is much bigger, the eyebrows much bushier, and it's missing the prominent diagonal lines on the skin beneath the eyes.
One sometimes can get results with being over the top pushy with Holocaust Claims.Eye of Zyclone wrote: ↑Sat Apr 18, 2026 7:27 amPerhaps you could try to fool AI with some veiled revisionism by suggesting to it that the alleged Nazi shrunken heads conveniently vanished and were never scientifically analyzed and that the making of such shrunken heads would have been impossible without the secret decoction of Amazonian plants and complicated process used by Jivaro master head-shrinkers for that purpose.
....