Germar Rudolf on the Conspiracy Theory Question

A revisionist safe space
User avatar
Eye of Zyclone
Posts: 384
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2025 3:12 pm

Re: Germar Rudolf on the Conspiracy Theory Question

Post by Eye of Zyclone »

Stubble wrote: Mon May 18, 2026 1:27 pm The points of departure here aren't points of departure though EoZ. I think we are talking past one another. Without the show trials to introduce excuses for the lack of evidence, the jews would be shouting at clouds about the dog that didn't bark man.
I disagree on this. Most people know nothing about the victors' excuses for the lack of evidence (through the "facts of common knowledge" trick and the "judicial notice" trick) and actually believe that the Holocaust is "the best documented genocide in history." The general public, now and back then, was turned into firm believers of the Holocaust story after being shown horror pictures of typhus victims misrepresented as undeniable graphic evidence of mass murder in Nazi camps and also after hearing Rudolf Hoess falsely confess it at the Soviet-style Nuremberg show trial. Also true for the Nazi defendants themselves.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Stubble wrote: Mon May 18, 2026 1:27 pm I get what you are saying, and, we aren't in disagreement here. It is simply that the setting of the table that made the event official wasn't strictly speaking jewish.
The Nuremberg "trials" were admittedly a Jewish & Zionist idea.

Image

Image

Image
"Holocaust deniers are very slick people. They justify everything they say with facts and figures."
User avatar
Stubble
Posts: 3460
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2024 10:43 am
Location: 5th Circle of Hell

Re: Germar Rudolf on the Conspiracy Theory Question

Post by Stubble »

Right, the claims in Germany proper were withdrawn however. It is thd claims made by the Poles and Soviets that stuck.

I suppose this can be debatable, and there is a great article from Wear;

https://codoh.com/library/document/jews ... narrative/
Jews Control Postwar Holocaust Trials and Narrative
By John Wear ∙ January 15, 2026
There is also the book from Germar though going over the streamlining and setting of the narrative as it is told today;

https://holocausthandbooks.com/book/nazi-gas-chambers/

Perhaps the reason we are talking past one another is that we are being loose with where we are drawing lines, or perhaps I am being too tight with my resolution on the matter.

Regarding the Soviet Claims, Majdanek is sunk, Auschwitz is damn near sunk, and basically they lean on 'The Holocaust of Bullets' and 'Aktion Reinhardt Murder Mills'.

The good ship Auschwitz still needs to be sent to the iron bottom sound of 'abandoned Holocaust claims', don't get me wrong, but, they have already walked it back almost 3/4's.

What is left of the 'Holocaust Claims' with regard to 'The Holocaust of Bullets' established that there was no order, which should burn the whole thesis down, but, somehow doesn't. With the 'Aktion Reinhardt Murder Mills', they didn't get much 'play' at the IMT.

/shrug

To be very clear, jews buried soap. They would literally be shouting at clouds if all the camps were retracted like Dachau.
If I were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
Post Reply