Comments on other threads.

[Keen]

viewtopic.php?p=26061#p26061

Hektor, on the accepted evidence of at least some graves and buried remains at TII;

The evidence is literally in line with the Revisionist thesis, which assumes that there are at least some people that died and where buried there.

The problem with that assumption, is that it does not align with any of the evidence from the eyewitnesses and the evidence of mass arrivals with no corresponding evidence of mass departures.

Liar.

The total lack of physical evidence for mass murder is evidence that there was no mass murder.

If the physical evidence for an alleged mass murder that - HAS TO EXIST - for the mass murder to have

actually happened - DOES NOT EXIST - then the alleged mass murder obviously - DID NOT HAPPEN.

Ergo: The orthodox “pure extermination center” story is - A PROVEN, NONSENSICAL BIG-LIE.

TisMS93 asks;

f they weren't killed, where did they go?

Revisionists hate that question, but they have to answer it with evidence, or else their assumption that there are a few human remains at TII, but not the remains of c800,000 is wrong. I find it rather odd, when presented with corroborating evidence of large areas of disturbed ground that contain cremated and heavily decomposed human remains, that revisionists cannot accept that.

Liar.

"Revisionists do not hate that question. In fact, they love it because not only is it easy to point out as a logical fallacy, it proves that the holocaustians cannot produce so-much-as the tiniest fraction of 1% of the fraudulently alleged physical evidence.

The total lack of physical evidence for mass murder is evidence that there was no mass murder.

If the physical evidence for an alleged mass murder that - HAS TO EXIST - for the mass murder to have

actually happened - DOES NOT EXIST - then the alleged mass murder obviously - DID NOT HAPPEN.

Ergo: The orthodox “pure extermination center” story is - A PROVEN, NONSENSICAL BIG-LIE.

Stubble provides some explanation;

See how 'history' and 'corroboration' work? You just make it fit.

Revisionists... do not believe that c800,000 died at and were buried at TII, so they make the evidence fit, by dismissing all the witnesses to the deaths and mass graves as liars and deciding that the areas of buried remains cannot equate to so many bodies.

Liar.

Most "revisionists" do no believe in the orthodox story of mass murder and burial because there is virtually no physical evidence to substantiate the physically impossible tall tales told by the lying "eyewitnesses."

As Mr. Gerdes has so clearly and succinctly pointed out:

The total lack of physical evidence for mass murder is evidence that there was no mass murder.

If the physical evidence for an alleged mass murder that - HAS TO EXIST - for the mass murder to have

actually happened - DOES NOT EXIST - then the alleged mass murder obviously - DID NOT HAPPEN.

Ergo: The orthodox “pure extermination center” story is - A PROVEN, NONSENSICAL BIG-LIE.

Note:

Some low IQ revisionists believe in the retarded "holocaust by train" theory, and accept, without any physical evidence, that there actually are "huge mass graves" at Treblinka II that contain thousands of bodies. But they are just as cowardly as the mentally ill HC cult members when it comes to accepting the challenge to prove the existence of physical evidence that would substantiate their unsubstantiated allegations.

[Stubble]

viewtopic.php?p=26061#p26061

Hektor, on the accepted evidence of at least some graves and buried remains at TII;

The evidence is literally in line with the Revisionist thesis, which assumes that there are at least some people that died and where buried there.

The problem with that assumption, is that it does not align with any of the evidence from the eyewitnesses and the evidence of mass arrivals with no corresponding evidence of mass departures.

TisMS93 asks;

f they weren't killed, where did they go?

Revisionists hate that question, but they have to answer it with evidence, or else their assumption that there are a few human remains at TII, but not the remains of c800,000 is wrong. I find it rather odd, when presented with corroborating evidence of large areas of disturbed ground that contain cremated and heavily decomposed human remains, that revisionists cannot accept that.

Stubble provides some explanation;

See how 'history' and 'corroboration' work? You just make it fit.

Revisionists make the evidence fit with their assumptions and desired belief. They do not believe that c800,000 died at and were buried at TII, so they make the evidence fit, by dismissing all the witnesses to the deaths and mass graves as liars and deciding that the areas of buried remains cannot equate to so many bodies.

You accused me of 'quote mining' the other day, and here you are docking my quote, you quote mining faggot. If you are going to dock the damn quote at least have the damn decency to link back to it instead of cutting the link ID out of the quote. FFS.

[Nessie]

viewtopic.php?p=26061#p26061

Hektor, on the accepted evidence of at least some graves and buried remains at TII;

The evidence is literally in line with the Revisionist thesis, which assumes that there are at least some people that died and where buried there.

The problem with that assumption, is that it does not align with any of the evidence from the eyewitnesses and the evidence of mass arrivals with no corresponding evidence of mass departures.

TisMS93 asks;

f they weren't killed, where did they go?

Revisionists hate that question, but they have to answer it with evidence, or else their assumption that there are a few human remains at TII, but not the remains of c800,000 is wrong. I find it rather odd, when presented with corroborating evidence of large areas of disturbed ground that contain cremated and heavily decomposed human remains, that revisionists cannot accept that.

Stubble provides some explanation;

See how 'history' and 'corroboration' work? You just make it fit.

Revisionists make the evidence fit with their assumptions and desired belief. They do not believe that c800,000 died at and were buried at TII, so they make the evidence fit, by dismissing all the witnesses to the deaths and mass graves as liars and deciding that the areas of buried remains cannot equate to so many bodies.

You accused me of 'quote mining' the other day, and here you are docking my quote, you quote mining faggot. If you are going to dock the damn quote at least have the damn decency to link back to it instead of cutting the link ID out of the quote. FFS.

Is this a new rule you have invented, that when someone quotes others in a post and then someone else quotes that post, they have to link back to the posts the first person quoted from? TisMS93 quoted Hektor who was quoting you.

I have not altered the context of your quote to give it a different meaning. I have kept the context.