https://t.me/NSHeathenry/346"The table talks are full of ...statements – and they are CORRABORATED by other independent sources.." - Page 64
"The evidence suggests, beyond any reasonable doubt, that [Heinrich] Heim’s proof pages are genuine." - Page 194
"They are both [Heinrich Heim's Monologe & Henry Picker's Tischgespräche] based on real utterances by Hitler." - Page 200
"[Henry] Picker had told Quick(German magazine) that [Gerhard] Engel and [Karl-Heinrich] Bodenschatz(Göring’s liaison officer by Hitler) , as partakers at the dinners in the FHQ, had testified to their authenticity. In addition, it had been concluded that “new finds in the United States and Switzerland” proved “that the documents are authentic.” The latter must have referred to [Heinrich] Heim’s proof pages, found by Mau in July, and to [François] Genoud’s manuscript, which had been brought to the IfZ’s attention since the publication of Tischgespräche. This conclusion was of course ... valid in so far as it related to the documents themselves." - Page 76
"However, and this is very important, the results presented in this book should absolutely not be interpreted as meaning that the table talks are not authentic. They really are, at least for the most part, memoranda of statements that Hitler made at some point or another in his wartime HQs." - Page 388
https://t.me/NSHeathenry/920"In the table talks Hitler is also frequently depicted as criticizing every effort of the Church to meddle in politics, expressing the idea that organized religion (Christianity in particular) cannot be done away with until a viable alternative ideology is in place and the view that the Church could only lose a conflict with science. These views were developed and PRESENT already in Mein Kampf, and thus contain essentially nothing new at all. What the table talks do add to what we find in Mein Kampf, however, is the strong criticism of Christianity and Christian dogma. We see the same in other independent sources, too, such as WERNER KOEPPEN’S NOTES and Rosenberg’s and Goebbels’s diaries, SO WE CAN BE SURE THAT HE EXPRESSED SUCH VIEWS ..."
So you can follow those threads if you want to go more in depth. But focusing just on Hitler, here's why I don't think he believed in an actual "Positive Christianity" and that it was basically just a way to undermine Christianity and not a genuine belief.For critiques of Steigmann-Gall’s position, see Richard Weikart, review of Richard Steigmann-Gall, The Holy Reich, in German Studies Review 27 (2004): 174–76; the special edition of Journal of Contemporary History (vol. 42, no. 1, 2007) devoted to critiques of Steigmann-Gall; and Mark Edward Ruff, “The Nazis’ Religionspolitik: An Assessment of Recent Literature,” The Catholic Historical Review, 92 (2006), 252–66.
https://t.me/NSHeathenry/534The best way to finish off the churches is to PRETEND to be a more positive Christian.
This is corroborated in Rosenberg's diary:Minister Kerrl wanted to create a synthesis between National Socialism and Christianity in the NOBLEST sense. I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT THIS IS POSSIBLE
https://t.me/NSHeathenry/1020The Führer said that Kerrl's motives were certainly only NOBLE, but that it was a hopeless attempt to unite National Socialism and Christianity.
https://t.me/NSHeathenry/1037The idiocy of the Christian doctrine of salvation is for our time completely unusable. Nonetheless there are scholars, educated people, and men in high positions in public life, who hang on to it as on to a childhood faith. That even today one views the Christian doctrine of salvation as giving direction through a difficult life is completely incomprehensible.
https://t.me/NSHeathenry/235The Führer is deeply religious but utterly anti-Christian. He sees in Christianity a symptom of deterioration. With justification. It is an offshoot of the Jewish race. One sees that also in the similarity of religious rites. Both have absolutely no relationship to animals and will ultimately die out because of that
https://t.me/NSHeathenry/1019Fuhrer at the table: Christianity is a rebellion against creation. It is the reversal of all the laws of nature, which even in the smallest process of fertilization are based on struggle and selection of the best
...
The teaching [of Christianity is] against the omnipotence of Nature. The glorification of the weak, the sick, the crippled, the simple-minded
https://t.me/NSHeathenry/1089Hitler was convinced that Christianity was outmoded and dying. He thought he could speed its death by systematic education of German youth. Christianity would be replaced, he thought, by a new heroic, racial ideal of God.
https://t.me/NSHeathenry/392Christianity was not content with erecting an altar of its own, but rather first had to destroy the pagan altars. It was only from this passionate intolerance that an apodictic faith could take form; intolerance is an indispensable precondition.
It may be objected here that such phenomena in world history arise from mostly a specifically 𝗝𝗘𝗪𝗜𝗦𝗛 𝗠𝗢𝗗𝗘 𝗢𝗙 𝗧𝗛𝗢𝗨𝗚𝗛𝗧; 𝐈𝐍𝐃𝐄𝐄𝐃, that such fanaticism and intolerance embody the 𝗦𝗣𝗘𝗖𝗜𝗙𝗜𝗖𝗔𝗟𝗟𝗬 𝗝𝗘𝗪𝗜𝗦𝗛 𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗔𝗟𝗜𝗧𝗬. This may be a thousand-times true, and it’s a deeply regrettable 𝗙𝗔𝗖𝗧. The appearance of fanatical intolerance in human history may be both deeply regrettable and 𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗘𝗜𝗚𝗡 to human nature-but this doesn’t change the fact it exists today. The men who want to liberate our German nation from its present condition shouldn’t worry their heads with thinking how wonderful it would be if this or that had never arisen; rather, they must find ways to eliminate it. A worldview that’s inspired by infernal intolerance can only be broken by the same spirit, by a doctrine driven by the same determined will, and which is itself a pure and absolutely true new idea.
One may today regret the 𝗙𝗔𝗖𝗧 that the ADVENT OF CHRISTIANITY marked the appearance of the 𝗙𝗜𝗥𝗦𝗧 𝗦𝗣𝗜𝗥𝗜𝗧𝗨𝗔𝗟 𝗧𝗘𝗥𝗥𝗢𝗥 into the much freer ancient world. But the 𝗙𝗔𝗖𝗧 cannot be denied that, ever since then [i.e. ADVENT OF CHRISTIANITY], the world has been pervaded and dominated by this kind of 𝗖𝗢𝗘𝗥𝗖𝗜𝗢𝗡, and that violence has been broken only by violence, and terror only by terror. Only then can a new condition be constructively created.
https://t.me/NSHeathenry/520As a private citizen I would never break my word. As a POLITICIAN for Germany, if necessary, A THOUSAND TIMES
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PaganismPaganism (from Latin paganus 'rural, rustic', later 'civilian') is a term first used in the fourth century by early Christians for people in the Roman Empire who practiced polytheism, or ethnic religions other than Christianity, Judaism, and Samaritanism.
Severus Ziegler:With a laugh Hitler emphasized more than once that he had always been a HEATHEN
Kurt Lüdecke:You must know, I AM A HEATHEN. I understand that to mean: a non-Christian. Of course I have an inward relationship to a cosmic Almighty, to a Godhead.
https://t.me/NSHeathenry/690I myself am a HEATHEN to the core!
Bane wrote: ↑Sat May 24, 2025 11:55 pm There was a thread about this on the old forum that went quite in depth into the matter. I remember sifting through it shortly before the old forum went down, and would like to see if we can have it back here. Anyhow, my memory is faint on the thread but the crux of it was whether or not Hitler was a Christian and wanted to have Germany be a Christian nation. Some members mentioned how the Protestant Reformations, for example, wrecked Germany and how that perhaps gave way for Hitlers perceived anti Christian sentiments.
This is a fake quote. The quote from Gerhard Engel's English memoir (not a letter as is often claimed) is:"I am now as before a Catholic and will always remain so."
- Adolf Hitler, to General Gerhard Engel, 1941
However, even this is a mistranslation of the original German. A better translation is:Now as before HE was a Catholic and would remain so.
In context, this is referring to Hitler being a member of the Catholic Church and remaining a nominal Catholic for pragmatic reasons, not being a believing Catholic. Within the same memoir this is quoted from, Gerhard Engel says:He was still a member of the Catholic Church and would remain so. The Church was far too clever to excommunicate him.
https://t.me/NSHeathenry/865Führer spoke at length again about religious belief and his attitude to the churches. Undoubtedly under sniper fire from B(ormann) and H(immler) a less conciliatory attitude is developing. Whereas in the past he wanted to live and let live, he [Hitler] is now determined to fight the churches. Führer literally: ‘The war, here as in many other areas, presents a favourable opportunity to DISPOSE of it (the church question) ROOT AND BRANCH.'
Ok. Thanks for the correction.fireofice wrote: ↑Sun May 25, 2025 6:02 pmThis is a fake quote. The quote from Gerhard Engel's English memoir (not a letter as is often claimed) is:"I am now as before a Catholic and will always remain so."
- Adolf Hitler, to General Gerhard Engel, 1941
However, even this is a mistranslation of the original German. A better translation is:Now as before HE was a Catholic and would remain so.
In context, this is referring to Hitler being a member of the Catholic Church and remaining a nominal Catholic for pragmatic reasons, not being a believing Catholic. Within the same memoir this is quoted from, Gerhard Engel says:He was still a member of the Catholic Church and would remain so. The Church was far too clever to excommunicate him.
https://t.me/NSHeathenry/865Führer spoke at length again about religious belief and his attitude to the churches. Undoubtedly under sniper fire from B(ormann) and H(immler) a less conciliatory attitude is developing. Whereas in the past he wanted to live and let live, he [Hitler] is now determined to fight the churches. Führer literally: ‘The war, here as in many other areas, presents a favourable opportunity to DISPOSE of it (the church question) ROOT AND BRANCH.'