The CODOH Revisionist Forum

Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Sat Feb 28, 2026 4:30 pm The Koherr Report is corroborated by the Holfe Telegram, so much for single report.

Er… the “Holfe” telegram!?!?
Who was HOLFE?

ResearcherGuy wrote: ↑Thu Feb 26, 2026 8:16 pm…Records were sloppy, except the very detailed Koherr report and Holfe Telegram...

I’ve just provided you with credible evidence showing the alleged intercept of a telegram from Höfle has many issues and is almost certainly a planted forgery.

Here: viewtopic.php?p=22505#p22505

Why have you ignored that evidence?
[/quote]

Sturmbannführer Hermann Höfle, do some research instead of rolling your eyes. "Credible evidence" = run on paragraph making wild claims and presumptions, no citations or sources.

ResearcherGuy wrote: ↑Sun Mar 01, 2026 5:58 pm

Hektor wrote: ↑Fri Feb 27, 2026 7:52 pm That's odd. You argue that "Sonderbehandlung" meant Euthanasia, yet the documents you cite or show don't use Sonderbehandlung at alll.

Nope, that is your poor reading comprehension.

Is you throwing a snippet there now your poor communication skills? If you have some critique formulate it sufficiently and clearly.

ResearcherGuy wrote: ↑Sun Mar 01, 2026 5:58 pm

I'm surprised you came back.

You ignored the request I made below. It was not rhetorical. You need to respond if you want to continue participating on the forum.

If you are going to double-down and claim that you have not misrepresented yourself, then you need to explain your weird position (seemingly unique to you alone) that over a million Jews were executed at the AR camps but weren't gassed.

Archie wrote: ↑Thu Feb 26, 2026 11:33 pm

ResearcherGuy wrote: ↑Thu Feb 26, 2026 11:07 pm My position is that murder of them is quite plausible given that they dissapeared without a trace.

ResearcherGuy,

Given that it is now very apparent that you are not a revisionist, please explain to me why you decided to represent yourself dishonestly and why you thought that was a good idea.

Those who disagree with us are welcome on the forum, and we have a Debate board precisely for this. The dishonesty you have displayed, however, is not welcome.

This is an openly and unapologetically revisionist-run forum. However, we take no official editorial stance on any particular issue and people can participate regardless of belief. This includes revisionists who may differ from other revisionists on some things, as well as those who are still "on the fence." We would ask only that you not present yourself dishonestly (e.g., by pretending to be a revisionist when you definitely are not).

Hektor wrote: ↑Sun Mar 01, 2026 7:29 pm Is you throwing a snippet there now your poor communication skills? If you have some critique formulate it sufficiently and clearly.

"Is you throwing a snippet there now your poor communication skills?" Talk about irony.

ResearcherGuy wrote: ↑Sun Mar 01, 2026 6:04 pm

Wahrheitssucher wrote: ↑Sat Feb 28, 2026 4:30 pm

woefully_bad_researcher_guy wrote:The Koherr Report is corroborated by the Holfe Telegram, so much for single report.

Er… the “Holfe” telegram!?!?
Who was HOLFE?

ResearcherGuy wrote: ↑Thu Feb 26, 2026 8:16 pm…Records were sloppy, except the very detailed Koherr report and Holfe Telegram...

I’ve just provided you with credible evidence showing the alleged intercept of a telegram from Höfle has many issues and is almost certainly a planted forgery.

Here: viewtopic.php?p=22505#p22505

Why have you ignored that evidence?

Sturmbannführer Hermann Höfle, do some research instead of rolling your eyes. "Credible evidence" = run on paragraph making wild claims and presumptions, no citations or sources.

Ok.
This is proof we are dealing with a semi-literate dimwit who:
a.) can’t distinguish between two different spellings,
and
b.) who doesn’t understand + doesn’t respond to evidence refuting their position.

ResearcherGuy wrote: ↑Sun Mar 01, 2026 8:46 pm

Hektor wrote: ↑Sun Mar 01, 2026 7:29 pm Is you throwing a snippet there now your poor communication skills? If you have some critique formulate it sufficiently and clearly.

"Is you throwing a snippet there now your poor communication skills?" Talk about irony.

Nope talking about the way you behave (again).